PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWV vs. ISVL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWV vs. ISVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 17.44% return, which is significantly higher than ISVL's 8.45% return.


VTWV

1D
-1.22%
1M
2.86%
YTD
17.44%
6M
16.55%
1Y
41.49%
3Y*
17.89%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
10.32%

ISVL

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.16%
YTD
8.45%
6M
12.58%
1Y
28.37%
3Y*
21.34%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWV vs. ISVL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
17.44%12.72%7.83%14.67%-14.46%7.22%
ISVL
iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF
8.45%42.84%4.58%17.56%-13.69%7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWV and ISVL is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2021

0.70

The correlation between VTWV and ISVL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTWV vs. ISVL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWV
ISVL

Financial Services

23.9%
20.8%

Industrials

11.9%
23.3%

Real Estate

10.4%
11.1%

Healthcare

10.2%
3.7%

Technology

10.0%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
10.4%

Energy

8.9%
7.3%

Basic Materials

5.4%
9.1%

Utilities

5.2%
1.5%

Communication Services

2.7%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.2%
5.3%

Financial Services

VTWV
23.9%
ISVL
20.8%

Industrials

VTWV
11.9%
ISVL
23.3%

Real Estate

VTWV
10.4%
ISVL
11.1%

Healthcare

VTWV
10.2%
ISVL
3.7%

Technology

VTWV
10.0%
ISVL
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWV
9.2%
ISVL
10.4%

Energy

VTWV
8.9%
ISVL
7.3%

Basic Materials

VTWV
5.4%
ISVL
9.1%

Utilities

VTWV
5.2%
ISVL
1.5%

Communication Services

VTWV
2.7%
ISVL
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

VTWV
2.2%
ISVL
5.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWV vs. ISVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWV
VTWV Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VTWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

ISVL
ISVL Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ISVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISVL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
ISVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISVL Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWV vs. ISVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTWVISVLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.36

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.83

2.28

+2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.46

8.95

+7.51

VTWV vs. ISVL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWV Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the ISVL Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWV and ISVL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTWVISVLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

1.98

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

0.60

-0.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.70

-0.21

Drawdowns

VTWV vs. ISVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than ISVL's maximum drawdown of -30.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and ISVL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWVISVLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.73%

-30.48%

-15.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

-12.48%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.72%

-12.93%

-13.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.72%

-30.48%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.43%

-2.16%

+0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.81%

-6.66%

-1.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

3.18%

-0.65%

Volatility

VTWV vs. ISVL - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) at 4.54%. This indicates that VTWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISVL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWVISVLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

4.54%

+0.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.15%

12.01%

+0.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.17%

14.47%

+3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.72%

16.90%

+4.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.54%

16.78%

+6.76%

VTWV vs. ISVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than ISVL's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTWV vs. ISVL - Dividend Comparison

VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than ISVL's 2.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISVL
iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF
2.48%2.69%3.92%3.82%3.37%2.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTWV
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF
1.58%1.79%1.78%2.02%2.07%1.60%1.49%1.82%2.04%1.63%1.57%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTWV and ISVL have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTWV has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to ISVL (4.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWV dropped -45.73% vs ISVL's -30.48%.

On 5-year performance, ISVL leads with 10.07% vs 6.66% for VTWV. On fees, VTWV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, ISVL has been the lower-risk option at 4.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ISVL has performed better with a 10.07% return vs 6.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ISVL.

ISVL has the higher dividend yield at 2.48%, compared with 1.58% for VTWV.

VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while ISVL tracks FTSE Developed ex US ex Korea Small Cap Focused Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWV and 0.30% for ISVL.

VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWV and ISVL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer