PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISVL vs. ISCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISVL vs. ISCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) and iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISVL achieves a 9.12% return, which is significantly higher than ISCF's 7.82% return.


ISVL

1D
0.28%
1M
0.13%
YTD
9.12%
6M
9.39%
1Y
29.74%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
11.08%
10Y*

ISCF

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.01%
YTD
7.82%
6M
8.05%
1Y
22.38%
3Y*
18.06%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
9.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISVL vs. ISCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ISVL
iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF
9.12%42.84%4.58%17.56%-13.69%8.32%
ISCF
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
7.82%33.65%4.75%11.50%-15.07%9.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ISVL and ISCF is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2021

0.96

The correlation between ISVL and ISCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISVL vs. ISCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISVL
ISCF

Industrials

22.1%
23.8%

Financial Services

21.4%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
12.4%

Real Estate

10.8%
8.5%

Basic Materials

10.1%
11.6%

Energy

6.0%
4.6%

Technology

4.9%
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
3.9%

Healthcare

3.5%
5.3%

Communication Services

2.8%
3.7%

Utilities

1.3%
3.5%

Industrials

ISVL
22.1%
ISCF
23.8%

Financial Services

ISVL
21.4%
ISCF
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

ISVL
11.1%
ISCF
12.4%

Real Estate

ISVL
10.8%
ISCF
8.5%

Basic Materials

ISVL
10.1%
ISCF
11.6%

Energy

ISVL
6.0%
ISCF
4.6%

Technology

ISVL
4.9%
ISCF
10.8%

Consumer Defensive

ISVL
4.7%
ISCF
3.9%

Healthcare

ISVL
3.5%
ISCF
5.3%

Communication Services

ISVL
2.8%
ISCF
3.7%

Utilities

ISVL
1.3%
ISCF
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISVL vs. ISCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISVL
ISVL Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ISVL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISVL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISVL Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ISVL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISVL Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

ISCF
ISCF Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ISCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCF Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISVL vs. ISCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) and iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISVLISCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.28

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

1.98

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.34

7.27

+2.08

ISVL vs. ISCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISVL Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is higher than the ISCF Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISVL and ISCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISVL vs. ISCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISVL drawdown since its inception was -30.48%, smaller than the maximum ISCF drawdown of -40.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISVL and ISCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISVLISCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.48%

-40.79%

+10.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.48%

-11.34%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.93%

-13.85%

+0.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.48%

-30.70%

+0.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

-2.15%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.61%

-8.12%

+1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

3.09%

+0.10%

Volatility

ISVL vs. ISCF - Volatility Comparison

iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF (ISVL) and iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) have volatilities of 4.43% and 4.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISVLISCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

4.61%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.45%

12.43%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.79%

14.80%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

16.72%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.77%

17.42%

-0.65%

ISVL vs. ISCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISVL has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ISCF's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISVL vs. ISCF - Dividend Comparison

ISVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.16%, less than ISCF's 3.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISCF
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
3.67%3.76%4.29%3.94%2.73%3.93%2.30%2.87%2.14%1.97%2.89%1.46%
ISVL
iShares International Developed Small Cap Value Factor ETF
3.16%2.69%3.92%3.82%3.37%2.82%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, ISVL and ISCF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ISCF has higher volatility (4.61%) compared to ISVL (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISVL dropped -30.48% vs ISCF's -40.79%.

On 5-year performance, ISVL leads with 11.08% vs 7.94% for ISCF. On fees, ISVL is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, ISVL has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ISVL has performed better with a 11.08% return vs 7.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISVL is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ISCF.

ISCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 3.16% for ISVL.

ISVL is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while ISCF is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. ISVL tracks FTSE Developed ex US ex Korea Small Cap Focused Value Index, while ISCF tracks MSCI World exUSA SmallCap Diversified Multi-Factor. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ISVL and 0.40% for ISCF.

ISVL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISVL and ISCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer