VTWV vs. BSVO
VTWV (Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF) and BSVO (EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. VTWV is passively managed, while BSVO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VTWV returned 19.06%/yr vs 19.99%/yr for BSVO. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VTWV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for BSVO.
Performance
VTWV vs. BSVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 18.98% return, which is significantly lower than BSVO's 20.22% return.
VTWV
- 1D
- 1.31%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- 18.98%
- 6M
- 18.10%
- 1Y
- 43.90%
- 3Y*
- 19.06%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.34%
BSVO
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 20.22%
- 6M
- 19.77%
- 1Y
- 45.25%
- 3Y*
- 19.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTWV vs. BSVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 18.98% | 12.72% | 7.83% | 18.03% |
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 20.22% | 9.21% | 4.68% | 22.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWV and BSVO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2023 | 0.95 |
The correlation between VTWV and BSVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTWV vs. BSVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTWV
BSVO
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
VTWV
BSVO
Industrials
VTWV
BSVO
Real Estate
VTWV
BSVO
Healthcare
VTWV
BSVO
Technology
VTWV
BSVO
Consumer Cyclical
VTWV
BSVO
Energy
VTWV
BSVO
Basic Materials
VTWV
BSVO
Utilities
VTWV
BSVO
-
Communication Services
VTWV
BSVO
Consumer Defensive
VTWV
BSVO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTWV vs. BSVO — Risk / Return Rank
VTWV
BSVO
VTWV vs. BSVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTWV | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.42 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.11 | 5.47 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.42 | 15.58 | +1.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTWV | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.43 | 2.41 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.81 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
VTWV vs. BSVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than BSVO's maximum drawdown of -28.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and BSVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWV | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.73% | -28.67% | -17.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -8.31% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.72% | -28.67% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -0.09% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.81% | -5.72% | -2.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 2.91% | -0.38% |
Volatility
VTWV vs. BSVO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) have volatilities of 5.00% and 4.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTWV | BSVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 4.83% | +0.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.20% | 12.07% | +0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.16% | 18.88% | -0.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.73% | 21.73% | 0.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.54% | 21.73% | +1.81% |
VTWV vs. BSVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BSVO's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTWV vs. BSVO - Dividend Comparison
VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than BSVO's 1.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSVO EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.26% | 1.52% | 1.61% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.56% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, VTWV and BSVO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTWV has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to BSVO (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWV dropped -45.73% vs BSVO's -28.67%.
On 3-year performance, BSVO leads with 19.99% vs 19.06% for VTWV. On fees, VTWV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BSVO has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BSVO has performed better with a 19.99% return vs 19.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTWV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BSVO.
VTWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.56%, compared with 1.26% for BSVO.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Bridgeway. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWV and 0.47% for BSVO.
VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTWV and BSVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer