PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSVO vs. SMLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSVO vs. SMLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSVO achieves a 25.63% return, which is significantly higher than SMLV's 23.05% return.


BSVO

1D
-0.25%
1M
1.52%
6M
16.16%
YTD
25.63%
1Y
47.58%
3Y*
16.19%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.01%

SMLV

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.72%
6M
16.25%
YTD
23.05%
1Y
34.18%
3Y*
16.71%
5Y*
10.12%
10Y*
10.64%
ALL TIME*
11.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.33M$3.94M$4.08M
$451.73K$474.34K$539.60K

BSVO vs. SMLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BSVO
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF
25.63%9.21%4.68%21.95%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
23.05%5.66%16.77%9.64%

Correlation

The correlation between BSVO and SMLV is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2023

0.92

The correlation between BSVO and SMLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

BSVO vs. SMLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
BSVO
SMLV

Financial Services

34.7%
30.9%

Consumer Cyclical

15.7%
9.0%

Industrials

13.0%
14.3%

Energy

12.5%
1.5%

Technology

6.1%
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
3.5%

Basic Materials

4.8%
3.3%

Communication Services

4.1%
2.3%

Healthcare

3.7%
8.9%

Real Estate

0.7%
11.9%

Utilities

-

2.7%

Financial Services

BSVO
34.7%
SMLV
30.9%

Consumer Cyclical

BSVO
15.7%
SMLV
9.0%

Industrials

BSVO
13.0%
SMLV
14.3%

Energy

BSVO
12.5%
SMLV
1.5%

Technology

BSVO
6.1%
SMLV
11.8%

Consumer Defensive

BSVO
4.9%
SMLV
3.5%

Basic Materials

BSVO
4.8%
SMLV
3.3%

Communication Services

BSVO
4.1%
SMLV
2.3%

Healthcare

BSVO
3.7%
SMLV
8.9%

Real Estate

BSVO
0.7%
SMLV
11.9%

Utilities

BSVO

-

SMLV
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSVO vs. SMLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BSVO
BSVO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BSVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSVO Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
BSVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSVO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BSVO vs. SMLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSVOSMLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.39

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.31

4.43

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.42

12.96

+3.46

BSVO vs. SMLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSVO Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is comparable to the SMLV Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSVO and SMLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSVO vs. SMLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSVO drawdown since its inception was -28.67%, smaller than the maximum SMLV drawdown of -42.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSVO and SMLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSVOSMLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.67%

-42.45%

+13.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-7.34%

-0.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.67%

-20.40%

-8.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.45%

-1.22%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.50%

-5.40%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.50%

+0.19%

Volatility

BSVO vs. SMLV - Volatility Comparison

EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF (BSVO) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) have volatilities of 3.60% and 3.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSVOSMLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

3.67%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.48%

9.58%

+1.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.09%

15.38%

+2.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.41%

18.21%

+3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.41%

20.90%

+0.51%

BSVO vs. SMLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSVO has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than SMLV's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSVO vs. SMLV - Dividend Comparison

BSVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than SMLV's 2.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSVO
EA Bridgeway Omni Small-Cap Value ETF
1.21%1.52%1.61%1.43%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.21%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSVO and SMLV have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMLV has higher volatility (3.67%) compared to BSVO (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSVO dropped -28.67% vs SMLV's -42.45%.

On 3-year performance, SMLV leads with 16.71% vs 16.19% for BSVO. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SMLV has performed better with a 16.71% return vs 16.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for BSVO.

SMLV has the higher dividend yield at 2.21%, compared with 1.21% for BSVO.

BSVO is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while SMLV is Low Volatility. They also come from different issuers: Bridgeway and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for BSVO and 0.12% for SMLV.

BSVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSVO and SMLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer