VTWV vs. BSMC
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC).
VTWV and BSMC are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VTWV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Value Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010. BSMC is an actively managed fund by Brandes. It was launched on Oct 3, 2023.
Performance
VTWV vs. BSMC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VTWV vs. BSMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 5.55% | 12.72% | 7.83% | 18.84% |
BSMC Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF | 4.87% | 15.52% | 10.21% | 11.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 5.55% return, which is significantly higher than BSMC's 4.87% return.
VTWV
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- 5.55%
- 6M
- 8.39%
- 1Y
- 28.79%
- 3Y*
- 13.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.59%
- 10Y*
- 9.64%
BSMC
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -5.77%
- YTD
- 4.87%
- 6M
- 8.71%
- 1Y
- 24.35%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VTWV vs. BSMC - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BSMC's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VTWV vs. BSMC — Risk / Return Rank
VTWV
BSMC
VTWV vs. BSMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTWV | BSMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 1.27 | +0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.88 | 1.89 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.25 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.07 | 1.93 | +0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.17 | 7.87 | +0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTWV | BSMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 1.27 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 1.08 | -0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWV and BSMC is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VTWV vs. BSMC - Dividend Comparison
VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than BSMC's 0.99% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.76% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
BSMC Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF | 0.99% | 1.17% | 1.02% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VTWV vs. BSMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than BSMC's maximum drawdown of -19.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and BSMC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWV | BSMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.73% | -19.15% | -26.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.90% | -12.60% | -1.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.82% | -5.77% | +0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.89% | -2.71% | -5.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 3.10% | +0.43% |
Volatility
VTWV vs. BSMC - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a higher volatility of 6.40% compared to Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) at 5.31%. This indicates that VTWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VTWV | BSMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 5.31% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.23% | 10.45% | +2.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.20% | 19.31% | +2.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 16.25% | +5.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.50% | 16.25% | +7.25% |