BSMC vs. TSCV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

BSMC (Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF) and TSCV (Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BSMC charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for TSCV.

Performance

BSMC vs. TSCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) and Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSMC achieves a 9.66% return, which is significantly lower than TSCV's 20.01% return.

BSMC

• 1D: 0.45%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 9.66%
• 6M: 9.35%
• 1Y: 23.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

TSCV

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: 4.42%
• YTD: 20.01%
• 6M: 18.17%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSMC vs. TSCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BSMC Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF	9.66%	4.40%
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF	20.01%	6.24%

Correlation

The correlation between BSMC and TSCV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2025	0.83

Return for Risk

BSMC vs. TSCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSMC

BSMC Risk / Return Rank: 54
BSMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
BSMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
BSMC Omega Ratio Rank: 48
BSMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
BSMC Martin Ratio Rank: 57

TSCV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSMC vs. TSCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF (BSMC) and Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF (TSCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BSMC	TSCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.66	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.40	—	—

Drawdowns

BSMC vs. TSCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSMC drawdown since its inception was -19.15%, which is greater than TSCV's maximum drawdown of -10.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSMC and TSCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	BSMC	TSCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.15%	-10.17%	-8.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.60%	-0.82%	-1.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.65%	-1.95%	-0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.55%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BSMC	TSCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.71%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.63%	16.72%	-2.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.06%	16.72%	-0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.06%	16.72%	-0.66%

BSMC vs. TSCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSMC has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TSCV's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

BSMC vs. TSCV - Dividend Comparison

BSMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than TSCV's 0.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BSMC Brandes U.S. Small-Mid Cap Value ETF	0.95%	1.17%	1.02%	0.15%
TSCV Thrivent Small Cap Value ETF	0.24%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BSMC and TSCV in my portfolio?

BSMC and TSCV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, BSMC or TSCV?

On fees, TSCV is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BSMC or TSCV?

TSCV is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BSMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BSMC or TSCV?

BSMC has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.24% for TSCV.

What is the main difference between BSMC and TSCV?

They also come from different issuers: Brandes and Thrivent. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for BSMC and 0.60% for TSCV.