VTWV vs. BNDX
VTWV (Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF) and BNDX (Vanguard Total International Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTWV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Value Index, while BNDX is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTWV returned 10.58%/yr vs 1.69%/yr for BNDX. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. VTWV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for BNDX.
Performance
VTWV vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWV achieves a 19.49% return, which is significantly higher than BNDX's 0.85% return. Over the past 10 years, VTWV has outperformed BNDX with an annualized return of 10.58%, while BNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.69% annualized return.
VTWV
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- 3.11%
- YTD
- 19.49%
- 6M
- 15.14%
- 1Y
- 40.78%
- 3Y*
- 17.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.85%
- 10Y*
- 10.58%
BNDX
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 0.99%
- 1Y
- 1.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.13%
- 5Y*
- 0.29%
- 10Y*
- 1.69%
VTWV vs. BNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 19.49% | 12.72% | 7.83% | 14.67% | -14.46% | 27.90% | 4.88% | 22.44% | -13.34% | 8.06% |
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 0.85% | 2.86% | 3.57% | 8.77% | -12.76% | -2.29% | 4.65% | 7.87% | 2.81% | 2.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWV and BNDX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013 | -0.02 |
The correlation between VTWV and BNDX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VTWV vs. BNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTWV
BNDX
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Technology
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
VTWV
BNDX
Industrials
VTWV
BNDX
Real Estate
VTWV
BNDX
Healthcare
VTWV
BNDX
Technology
VTWV
BNDX
-
Consumer Cyclical
VTWV
BNDX
-
Energy
VTWV
BNDX
Basic Materials
VTWV
BNDX
-
Utilities
VTWV
BNDX
Communication Services
VTWV
BNDX
Consumer Defensive
VTWV
BNDX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTWV vs. BNDX — Risk / Return Rank
VTWV
BNDX
VTWV vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTWV | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.10 | +0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.74 | 0.68 | +4.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.17 | 1.90 | +14.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTWV vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWV drawdown since its inception was -45.73%, which is greater than BNDX's maximum drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWV and BNDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWV | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.73% | -16.23% | -29.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -2.93% | -5.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.72% | -2.93% | -23.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.72% | -15.86% | -10.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.73% | -16.23% | -29.50% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.18% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.80% | -3.10% | -4.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 1.05% | +1.48% |
Volatility
VTWV vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF (VTWV) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) at 1.50%. This indicates that VTWV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTWV | BNDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.87% | 1.50% | +4.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.65% | 2.96% | +9.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.46% | 3.47% | +14.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 4.89% | +16.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.56% | 4.10% | +19.46% |
VTWV vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTWV vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison
VTWV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.55%, less than BNDX's 4.48% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDX Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | 4.48% | 4.39% | 4.18% | 4.42% | 1.51% | 3.74% | 1.11% | 3.40% | 3.01% | 2.23% | 1.89% | 1.63% |
VTWV Vanguard Russell 2000 Value ETF | 1.55% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.07% | 1.60% | 1.49% | 1.82% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 1.57% | 2.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTWV and BNDX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTWV has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to BNDX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWV dropped -45.73% vs BNDX's -16.23%.
On 10-year performance, VTWV leads with 10.58% vs 1.69% for BNDX. On fees, BNDX is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BNDX has been the lower-risk option at 1.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTWV has performed better with a 10.58% return vs 1.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNDX is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VTWV.
BNDX has the higher dividend yield at 4.48%, compared with 1.55% for VTWV.
VTWV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while BNDX is Global Bonds. VTWV tracks Russell 2000 Value Index, while BNDX tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate ex-USD Float Adjusted RIC Capped Index (USD Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWV and 0.07% for BNDX.
VTWV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTWV and BNDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer