PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BNDX vs. VTABX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BNDX vs. VTABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BNDX achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly higher than VTABX's 0.05% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with BNDX having a 1.52% annualized return and VTABX not far ahead at 1.57%.


BNDX

1D
0.40%
1M
-0.58%
6M
0.16%
YTD
0.62%
1Y
1.23%
3Y*
4.12%
5Y*
-0.05%
10Y*
1.52%
ALL TIME*
2.28%

VTABX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.98%
6M
-0.28%
YTD
0.05%
1Y
1.11%
3Y*
4.06%
5Y*
-0.05%
10Y*
1.57%
ALL TIME*
2.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$166.29M$189.02M$229.54M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BNDX vs. VTABX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
0.62%2.86%3.57%8.77%-12.76%-2.29%4.65%7.87%2.81%2.40%
VTABX
Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.05%2.96%3.92%8.77%-12.92%-2.22%4.54%8.83%2.97%2.39%

Correlation

The correlation between BNDX and VTABX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013

0.84

The correlation between BNDX and VTABX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BNDX vs. VTABX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BNDX
BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

VTABX
VTABX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
VTABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTABX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
VTABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTABX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BNDX vs. VTABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) and Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BNDXVTABXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.07

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.42

0.40

+0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.08

1.01

+0.07

BNDX vs. VTABX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BNDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is comparable to the VTABX Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BNDX and VTABX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BNDX vs. VTABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BNDX drawdown since its inception was -16.23%, roughly equal to the maximum VTABX drawdown of -16.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BNDX and VTABX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BNDXVTABXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.23%

-16.16%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-2.90%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.93%

-2.90%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.86%

-15.81%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.23%

-16.16%

-0.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.41%

-1.80%

+0.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.08%

-3.02%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

1.15%

0.00%

Volatility

BNDX vs. VTABX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) has a higher volatility of 1.17% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares (VTABX) at 0.88%. This indicates that BNDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BNDXVTABXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

0.88%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.12%

2.70%

+0.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54%

3.12%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.91%

4.46%

+0.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.09%

3.61%

+0.48%

BNDX vs. VTABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BNDX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than VTABX's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BNDX vs. VTABX - Dividend Comparison

BNDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.55%, more than VTABX's 4.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.55%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%
VTABX
Vanguard Total International Bond Index Fund Admiral Shares
4.28%4.36%4.33%4.39%1.48%3.70%1.08%4.28%3.00%2.23%1.80%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


BNDX and VTABX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNDX has higher volatility (1.17%) compared to VTABX (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BNDX dropped -16.23% vs VTABX's -16.16%.

VTABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.37 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BNDX and VTABX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer