PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWO vs. ROSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWO vs. ROSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VTWO having a 20.92% return and ROSC slightly higher at 21.44%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTWO having a 10.77% annualized return and ROSC not far ahead at 11.09%.


VTWO

1D
1.69%
1M
-0.42%
6M
13.61%
YTD
20.92%
1Y
39.49%
3Y*
16.67%
5Y*
7.83%
10Y*
10.77%
ALL TIME*
11.43%

ROSC

1D
1.35%
1M
1.50%
6M
14.44%
YTD
21.44%
1Y
40.60%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
11.09%
ALL TIME*
9.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$136.27K$122.07K$123.34K
$175.64M$193.82M$227.97M

VTWO vs. ROSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
20.92%12.90%11.55%17.08%-20.49%14.79%20.22%25.81%-11.15%14.69%
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
21.44%10.18%7.28%18.88%-10.58%31.37%5.27%17.09%-12.38%24.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWO and ROSC is 0.80, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2015

0.82

The correlation between VTWO and ROSC shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.92 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VTWO vs. ROSC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWO
ROSC

Healthcare

20.2%
19.0%

Financial Services

17.6%
19.3%

Technology

14.8%
12.3%

Industrials

14.1%
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
14.8%

Real Estate

6.7%
5.7%

Energy

5.4%
2.3%

Basic Materials

4.4%
2.7%

Utilities

2.7%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
6.3%

Communication Services

2.2%
3.6%

Healthcare

VTWO
20.2%
ROSC
19.0%

Financial Services

VTWO
17.6%
ROSC
19.3%

Technology

VTWO
14.8%
ROSC
12.3%

Industrials

VTWO
14.1%
ROSC
11.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWO
9.2%
ROSC
14.8%

Real Estate

VTWO
6.7%
ROSC
5.7%

Energy

VTWO
5.4%
ROSC
2.3%

Basic Materials

VTWO
4.4%
ROSC
2.7%

Utilities

VTWO
2.7%
ROSC
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

VTWO
2.6%
ROSC
6.3%

Communication Services

VTWO
2.2%
ROSC
3.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWO vs. ROSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VTWO
VTWO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

ROSC
ROSC Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ROSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROSC Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
ROSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROSC Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VTWO vs. ROSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTWOROSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.48

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

5.26

-1.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.83

17.73

-4.90

VTWO vs. ROSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the ROSC Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWO and ROSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTWO vs. ROSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWO drawdown since its inception was -41.19%, roughly equal to the maximum ROSC drawdown of -43.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWO and ROSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWOROSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.19%

-43.13%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

-7.75%

-3.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.57%

-23.74%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.88%

-23.74%

-8.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.19%

-43.13%

+1.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.40%

-0.42%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.32%

-7.12%

-1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.30%

+0.79%

Volatility

VTWO vs. ROSC - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) at 3.55%. This indicates that VTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWOROSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

3.55%

+0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.11%

10.12%

+3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.30%

15.09%

+4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.45%

19.21%

+3.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.07%

20.25%

+2.82%

VTWO vs. ROSC - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWO has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than ROSC's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTWO vs. ROSC - Dividend Comparison

VTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than ROSC's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
1.77%2.08%2.00%2.01%1.51%2.13%1.75%3.05%2.86%2.13%2.20%2.48%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
1.09%1.25%1.21%1.45%1.48%1.13%0.92%1.36%1.41%1.18%1.27%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTWO and ROSC have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTWO has higher volatility (4.16%) compared to ROSC (3.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWO dropped -41.19% vs ROSC's -43.13%.

On 10-year performance, ROSC leads with 11.09% vs 10.77% for VTWO. On fees, VTWO is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, ROSC has been the lower-risk option at 3.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ROSC has performed better with a 11.09% return vs 10.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWO is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ROSC.

ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.77%, compared with 1.09% for VTWO.

VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index, while ROSC tracks ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Hartford. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTWO and 0.34% for ROSC.

ROSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWO and ROSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer