PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ROSC vs. VBR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ROSC vs. VBR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ROSC achieves a 19.82% return, which is significantly higher than VBR's 16.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ROSC having a 10.89% annualized return and VBR not far behind at 10.75%.


ROSC

1D
-0.46%
1M
0.15%
6M
14.78%
YTD
19.82%
1Y
38.72%
3Y*
15.41%
5Y*
9.77%
10Y*
10.89%
ALL TIME*
9.73%

VBR

1D
-0.20%
1M
0.58%
6M
10.78%
YTD
16.70%
1Y
27.67%
3Y*
14.39%
5Y*
9.74%
10Y*
10.75%
ALL TIME*
9.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$129.89K$138.46K$121.53K
$56.96M$55.85M$67.93M

ROSC vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
19.82%10.18%7.28%18.88%-10.58%31.37%5.27%17.09%-12.38%24.49%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
16.70%9.09%12.40%16.00%-9.38%28.08%5.90%22.78%-12.28%11.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ROSC and VBR is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2015

0.84

The correlation between ROSC and VBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

ROSC vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ROSC
VBR

Financial Services

19.3%
17.5%

Healthcare

19.0%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

14.8%
13.6%

Technology

12.3%
10.9%

Industrials

11.5%
17.3%

Consumer Defensive

6.3%
4.2%

Real Estate

5.7%
11.1%

Communication Services

3.6%
2.4%

Basic Materials

2.7%
5.3%

Energy

2.3%
4.3%

Utilities

1.8%
4.9%

Financial Services

ROSC
19.3%
VBR
17.5%

Healthcare

ROSC
19.0%
VBR
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ROSC
14.8%
VBR
13.6%

Technology

ROSC
12.3%
VBR
10.9%

Industrials

ROSC
11.5%
VBR
17.3%

Consumer Defensive

ROSC
6.3%
VBR
4.2%

Real Estate

ROSC
5.7%
VBR
11.1%

Communication Services

ROSC
3.6%
VBR
2.4%

Basic Materials

ROSC
2.7%
VBR
5.3%

Energy

ROSC
2.3%
VBR
4.3%

Utilities

ROSC
1.8%
VBR
4.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ROSC vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ROSC
ROSC Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
ROSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROSC Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
ROSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROSC Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

VBR
VBR Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VBR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VBR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VBR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VBR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VBR Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ROSC vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ROSCVBRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.31

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.72

2.93

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.90

10.70

+5.20

ROSC vs. VBR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ROSC Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is higher than the VBR Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ROSC and VBR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ROSC vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ROSC drawdown since its inception was -43.13%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ROSC and VBR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ROSCVBRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.13%

-61.98%

+18.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.75%

-8.85%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.74%

-24.19%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.74%

-24.19%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.13%

-45.28%

+2.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.74%

-1.40%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.12%

-8.21%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.42%

-0.12%

Volatility

ROSC vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison

Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF (ROSC) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) have volatilities of 3.31% and 3.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ROSCVBRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

3.36%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.05%

10.22%

-0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.14%

14.90%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.19%

19.56%

-0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.24%

21.66%

-1.42%

ROSC vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ROSC has a 0.34% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

ROSC vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison

ROSC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, more than VBR's 1.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ROSC
Hartford Multifactor Small Cap ETF
1.80%2.08%2.00%2.01%1.51%2.13%1.75%3.05%2.86%2.13%2.20%2.48%
VBR
Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF
1.77%1.95%1.98%2.12%2.03%1.75%1.68%2.06%2.35%1.79%1.77%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


ROSC and VBR have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VBR has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to ROSC (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ROSC dropped -43.13% vs VBR's -61.98%.

On 10-year performance, ROSC leads with 10.89% vs 10.75% for VBR. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ROSC has performed better with a 10.89% return vs 10.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for ROSC.

ROSC has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 1.77% for VBR.

ROSC is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. ROSC tracks ROSC-US - Hartford Multifactor Small Cap Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Hartford and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.34% for ROSC and 0.05% for VBR.

ROSC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ROSC and VBR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer