VTWO vs. FSLCX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX).
VTWO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010. FSLCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 12, 1998.
Performance
VTWO vs. FSLCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VTWO vs. FSLCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 1.54% | 12.90% | 11.55% | 17.08% | -20.49% | 14.79% | 20.22% | 25.81% | -11.15% | 14.69% |
FSLCX Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund | -1.90% | 14.95% | 9.27% | 19.70% | -22.71% | 20.26% | 13.80% | 29.46% | -11.70% | 13.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWO achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly higher than FSLCX's -1.90% return. Over the past 10 years, VTWO has outperformed FSLCX with an annualized return of 9.96%, while FSLCX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.56% annualized return.
VTWO
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -5.23%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 3.49%
- 1Y
- 26.61%
- 3Y*
- 13.37%
- 5Y*
- 3.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
FSLCX
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -6.22%
- YTD
- -1.90%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 18.88%
- 3Y*
- 12.54%
- 5Y*
- 4.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VTWO vs. FSLCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FSLCX's 0.90% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VTWO vs. FSLCX — Risk / Return Rank
VTWO
FSLCX
VTWO vs. FSLCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTWO | FSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.15 | 0.91 | +0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.70 | 1.43 | +0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.18 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.91 | 1.51 | +0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.12 | 5.00 | +2.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTWO | FSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 0.91 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.19 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | 0.41 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.39 | +0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWO and FSLCX is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VTWO vs. FSLCX - Dividend Comparison
VTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than FSLCX's 15.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 1.25% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.23% |
FSLCX Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund | 15.20% | 14.91% | 1.86% | 0.02% | 7.91% | 22.97% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 26.25% | 8.92% | 3.85% | 10.97% |
Drawdowns
VTWO vs. FSLCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWO drawdown since its inception was -41.19%, smaller than the maximum FSLCX drawdown of -61.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWO and FSLCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWO | FSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.19% | -61.22% | +20.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.90% | -12.51% | -1.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.88% | -30.04% | -1.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.19% | -45.42% | +4.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.29% | -9.41% | +2.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.47% | -9.87% | +1.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.74% | 3.79% | -0.05% |
Volatility
VTWO vs. FSLCX - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Fidelity Small Cap Stock Fund (FSLCX) have volatilities of 7.38% and 7.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VTWO | FSLCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.38% | 7.41% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.44% | 13.29% | +1.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.29% | 21.31% | +1.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.49% | 20.83% | +1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.04% | 21.12% | +1.92% |