PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTWO vs. CALF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTWO vs. CALF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTWO achieves a 17.08% return, which is significantly higher than CALF's 13.34% return.


VTWO

1D
-1.38%
1M
3.51%
YTD
17.08%
6M
15.89%
1Y
39.34%
3Y*
18.11%
5Y*
6.28%
10Y*
11.07%

CALF

1D
-1.12%
1M
4.91%
YTD
13.34%
6M
12.53%
1Y
30.24%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTWO vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
17.08%12.90%11.55%17.08%-20.49%14.79%20.22%25.81%-11.15%9.02%
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
13.34%2.33%-7.41%35.43%-15.20%40.68%16.55%18.18%-10.06%5.78%

Correlation

The correlation between VTWO and CALF is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2017

0.87

The correlation between VTWO and CALF shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VTWO vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTWO
CALF

Industrials

17.7%
5.9%

Technology

17.0%
29.7%

Healthcare

16.5%
9.4%

Financial Services

15.7%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
28.3%

Real Estate

6.1%
1.6%

Energy

6.1%
10.3%

Basic Materials

4.8%
1.6%

Utilities

2.9%

-

Communication Services

2.4%
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
4.3%

Industrials

VTWO
17.7%
CALF
5.9%

Technology

VTWO
17.0%
CALF
29.7%

Healthcare

VTWO
16.5%
CALF
9.4%

Financial Services

VTWO
15.7%
CALF
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VTWO
8.4%
CALF
28.3%

Real Estate

VTWO
6.1%
CALF
1.6%

Energy

VTWO
6.1%
CALF
10.3%

Basic Materials

VTWO
4.8%
CALF
1.6%

Utilities

VTWO
2.9%
CALF

-

Communication Services

VTWO
2.4%
CALF
8.8%

Consumer Defensive

VTWO
2.4%
CALF
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTWO vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTWO
VTWO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VTWO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTWO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTWO Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VTWO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTWO Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTWO vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTWOCALFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.34

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.60

4.94

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.79

14.08

-1.29

VTWO vs. CALF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTWO Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the CALF Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTWO and CALF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTWOCALFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.93

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.18

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.37

+0.15

Drawdowns

VTWO vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTWO drawdown since its inception was -41.19%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWO and CALF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTWOCALFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.19%

-47.58%

+6.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

-6.15%

-4.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.57%

-34.22%

+6.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.88%

-34.22%

+2.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-1.95%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.39%

-10.74%

+2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

2.15%

+0.93%

Volatility

VTWO vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) at 4.92%. This indicates that VTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTWOCALFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.73%

4.92%

+0.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.50%

10.47%

+3.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.12%

15.84%

+3.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.48%

23.44%

-0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.08%

26.02%

-2.94%

VTWO vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTWO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTWO vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison

VTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than CALF's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.28%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%0.00%0.00%
VTWO
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF
1.08%1.25%1.21%1.45%1.48%1.13%0.92%1.36%1.41%1.18%1.27%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTWO and CALF have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTWO has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to CALF (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWO dropped -41.19% vs CALF's -47.58%.

On 5-year performance, VTWO leads with 6.28% vs 4.12% for CALF. On fees, VTWO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, CALF has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VTWO has performed better with a 6.28% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTWO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.

CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.08% for VTWO.

VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index, while CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWO and 0.59% for CALF.

VTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTWO and CALF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer