VTWO vs. CALF
VTWO (Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF) and CALF (Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds - VTWO tracks the Russell 2000 Index while CALF tracks the Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VTWO returned 6.28%/yr vs 4.12%/yr for CALF. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTWO charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CALF.
Performance
VTWO vs. CALF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWO achieves a 17.08% return, which is significantly higher than CALF's 13.34% return.
VTWO
- 1D
- -1.38%
- 1M
- 3.51%
- YTD
- 17.08%
- 6M
- 15.89%
- 1Y
- 39.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.11%
- 5Y*
- 6.28%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
CALF
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 13.34%
- 6M
- 12.53%
- 1Y
- 30.24%
- 3Y*
- 10.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.12%
- 10Y*
- —
VTWO vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 17.08% | 12.90% | 11.55% | 17.08% | -20.49% | 14.79% | 20.22% | 25.81% | -11.15% | 9.02% |
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 13.34% | 2.33% | -7.41% | 35.43% | -15.20% | 40.68% | 16.55% | 18.18% | -10.06% | 5.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWO and CALF is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2017 | 0.87 |
The correlation between VTWO and CALF shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.89 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VTWO vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTWO
CALF
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
VTWO
CALF
Technology
VTWO
CALF
Healthcare
VTWO
CALF
Financial Services
VTWO
CALF
Consumer Cyclical
VTWO
CALF
Real Estate
VTWO
CALF
Energy
VTWO
CALF
Basic Materials
VTWO
CALF
Utilities
VTWO
CALF
-
Communication Services
VTWO
CALF
Consumer Defensive
VTWO
CALF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTWO vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank
VTWO
CALF
VTWO vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTWO | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.34 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 4.94 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.79 | 14.08 | -1.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTWO | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.07 | 1.93 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.18 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.37 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
VTWO vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWO drawdown since its inception was -41.19%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWO and CALF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWO | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.19% | -47.58% | +6.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.99% | -6.15% | -4.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.57% | -34.22% | +6.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.88% | -34.22% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.19% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -1.95% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.39% | -10.74% | +2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.08% | 2.15% | +0.93% |
Volatility
VTWO vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF (VTWO) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) at 4.92%. This indicates that VTWO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTWO | CALF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 4.92% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.50% | 10.47% | +3.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.12% | 15.84% | +3.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.48% | 23.44% | -0.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 26.02% | -2.94% |
VTWO vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWO has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTWO vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison
VTWO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than CALF's 1.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALF Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF | 1.28% | 1.43% | 1.07% | 1.18% | 0.85% | 2.63% | 0.82% | 0.99% | 1.39% | 0.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTWO Vanguard Russell 2000 ETF | 1.08% | 1.25% | 1.21% | 1.45% | 1.48% | 1.13% | 0.92% | 1.36% | 1.41% | 1.18% | 1.27% | 1.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTWO and CALF have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTWO has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to CALF (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWO dropped -41.19% vs CALF's -47.58%.
On 5-year performance, VTWO leads with 6.28% vs 4.12% for CALF. On fees, VTWO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, CALF has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VTWO has performed better with a 6.28% return vs 4.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTWO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.
CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.28%, compared with 1.08% for VTWO.
VTWO tracks Russell 2000 Index, while CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VTWO and 0.59% for CALF.
VTWO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTWO and CALF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer