PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CALF vs. XSMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CALF vs. XSMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CALF achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly lower than XSMO's 24.23% return.


CALF

1D
0.34%
1M
0.78%
YTD
10.96%
6M
9.95%
1Y
26.19%
3Y*
9.45%
5Y*
3.49%
10Y*

XSMO

1D
-1.05%
1M
3.78%
YTD
24.23%
6M
20.02%
1Y
34.26%
3Y*
25.28%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
15.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CALF vs. XSMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
10.96%2.33%-7.41%35.43%-15.20%40.68%16.55%18.18%-10.06%5.78%
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
24.23%9.80%17.45%21.55%-15.44%19.24%21.96%28.65%-3.44%10.09%

Correlation

The correlation between CALF and XSMO is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017

0.82

The correlation between CALF and XSMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CALF vs. XSMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CALF
XSMO

Technology

32.4%
22.1%

Consumer Cyclical

28.5%
8.6%

Healthcare

9.7%
14.3%

Energy

8.9%
2.9%

Communication Services

8.3%
4.5%

Industrials

5.4%
18.7%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
2.4%

Basic Materials

1.6%
6.0%

Real Estate

1.5%
4.9%

Financial Services

0.2%
12.2%

Utilities

-

3.5%

Technology

CALF
32.4%
XSMO
22.1%

Consumer Cyclical

CALF
28.5%
XSMO
8.6%

Healthcare

CALF
9.7%
XSMO
14.3%

Energy

CALF
8.9%
XSMO
2.9%

Communication Services

CALF
8.3%
XSMO
4.5%

Industrials

CALF
5.4%
XSMO
18.7%

Consumer Defensive

CALF
3.6%
XSMO
2.4%

Basic Materials

CALF
1.6%
XSMO
6.0%

Real Estate

CALF
1.5%
XSMO
4.9%

Financial Services

CALF
0.2%
XSMO
12.2%

Utilities

CALF

-

XSMO
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CALF vs. XSMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

XSMO
XSMO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
XSMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XSMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CALF vs. XSMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CALFXSMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

3.87

+0.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.68

13.07

-1.40

CALF vs. XSMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CALF Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the XSMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CALF and XSMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CALF vs. XSMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CALF drawdown since its inception was -47.58%, smaller than the maximum XSMO drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CALF and XSMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CALFXSMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.58%

-58.06%

+10.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

-8.89%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.22%

-24.76%

-9.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.22%

-29.62%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.01%

-1.05%

-2.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.69%

-11.11%

+0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.25%

2.63%

-0.38%

Volatility

CALF vs. XSMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF) is 5.39%, while Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) has a volatility of 7.31%. This indicates that CALF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XSMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CALFXSMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.39%

7.31%

-1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.92%

14.94%

-4.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.02%

19.41%

-3.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.39%

22.64%

+0.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.97%

24.13%

+1.84%

CALF vs. XSMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CALF has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than XSMO's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

CALF vs. XSMO - Dividend Comparison

CALF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than XSMO's 0.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.24%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%0.00%0.00%
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.53%0.75%0.63%0.96%1.19%0.30%0.82%0.69%0.66%0.27%0.30%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


CALF and XSMO have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XSMO has higher volatility (7.31%) compared to CALF (5.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CALF dropped -47.58% vs XSMO's -58.06%.

On 5-year performance, XSMO leads with 11.43% vs 3.49% for CALF. On fees, XSMO is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, CALF has been the lower-risk option at 5.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XSMO has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 3.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSMO is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.

CALF has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 0.53% for XSMO.

CALF is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while XSMO is Momentum. CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index, while XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for CALF and 0.36% for XSMO.

XSMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CALF and XSMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer