VTWG vs. XSMO
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO).
VTWG and XSMO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VTWG is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 Growth Index. It was launched on Sep 20, 2010. XSMO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P SmallCap 600 Index. It was launched on Mar 3, 2005. Both VTWG and XSMO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
VTWG vs. XSMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VTWG vs. XSMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | -2.07% | 13.07% | 15.15% | 18.90% | -26.49% | 2.84% | 34.72% | 28.75% | -9.45% | 22.27% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 7.05% | 9.80% | 17.45% | 21.55% | -15.44% | 19.24% | 21.96% | 28.65% | -3.44% | 23.95% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWG achieves a -2.07% return, which is significantly lower than XSMO's 7.05% return. Over the past 10 years, VTWG has underperformed XSMO with an annualized return of 9.83%, while XSMO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.73% annualized return.
VTWG
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -6.57%
- YTD
- -2.07%
- 6M
- -0.89%
- 1Y
- 24.55%
- 3Y*
- 12.59%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
XSMO
- 1D
- 1.24%
- 1M
- -4.33%
- YTD
- 7.05%
- 6M
- 4.97%
- 1Y
- 23.58%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 8.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.73%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VTWG vs. XSMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XSMO's 0.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VTWG vs. XSMO — Risk / Return Rank
VTWG
XSMO
VTWG vs. XSMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTWG | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 1.07 | -0.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | 1.59 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.21 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 1.75 | -0.09 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.61 | 7.23 | -1.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTWG | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 1.07 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 | 0.38 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.57 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.36 | +0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWG and XSMO is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VTWG vs. XSMO - Dividend Comparison
VTWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, more than XSMO's 0.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 0.70% | 0.64% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.54% | 0.48% | 0.72% | 0.72% | 0.64% | 0.96% | 0.72% |
XSMO Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.60% | 0.75% | 0.63% | 0.96% | 1.19% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 0.69% | 0.66% | 0.27% | 0.30% | 0.35% |
Drawdowns
VTWG vs. XSMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWG drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, smaller than the maximum XSMO drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWG and XSMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWG | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.07% | -58.06% | +15.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.88% | -13.42% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.49% | -29.62% | -10.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.07% | -39.39% | -2.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.52% | -4.59% | -5.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.62% | -11.21% | +0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.41% | 3.24% | +1.17% |
Volatility
VTWG vs. XSMO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) has a higher volatility of 8.83% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) at 7.71%. This indicates that VTWG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VTWG | XSMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.83% | 7.71% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.74% | 13.63% | +3.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.41% | 22.11% | +3.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.47% | 22.87% | +1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.14% | 24.05% | +0.09% |