VTWG vs. IVOO
VTWG (Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF) and IVOO (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds from Vanguard - VTWG tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Index while IVOO tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTWG returned 11.38%/yr vs 11.18%/yr for IVOO. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTWG charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IVOO.
Performance
VTWG vs. IVOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWG achieves a 18.68% return, which is significantly higher than IVOO's 14.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTWG having a 11.38% annualized return and IVOO not far behind at 11.18%.
VTWG
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- 18.68%
- 6M
- 15.50%
- 1Y
- 39.69%
- 3Y*
- 19.19%
- 5Y*
- 6.02%
- 10Y*
- 11.38%
IVOO
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 14.55%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- 1Y
- 26.17%
- 3Y*
- 16.66%
- 5Y*
- 8.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.18%
VTWG vs. IVOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 18.68% | 13.07% | 15.15% | 18.90% | -26.49% | 2.84% | 34.72% | 28.75% | -9.45% | 22.27% |
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 14.55% | 7.47% | 13.77% | 16.45% | -13.17% | 24.61% | 13.61% | 26.18% | -11.33% | 16.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWG and IVOO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010 | 0.89 |
The correlation between VTWG and IVOO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTWG vs. IVOO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTWG
IVOO
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
VTWG
IVOO
Industrials
VTWG
IVOO
Healthcare
VTWG
IVOO
Financial Services
VTWG
IVOO
Consumer Cyclical
VTWG
IVOO
Basic Materials
VTWG
IVOO
Energy
VTWG
IVOO
Consumer Defensive
VTWG
IVOO
Communication Services
VTWG
IVOO
Real Estate
VTWG
IVOO
Utilities
VTWG
IVOO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTWG vs. IVOO — Risk / Return Rank
VTWG
IVOO
VTWG vs. IVOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTWG | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.68 | 2.98 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.67 | 10.90 | -1.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTWG | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 1.69 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 | 0.42 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.53 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.62 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
VTWG vs. IVOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWG drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, roughly equal to the maximum IVOO drawdown of -42.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWG and IVOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWG | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.07% | -42.33% | +0.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.88% | -8.81% | -6.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.58% | -24.22% | -4.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.49% | -24.22% | -16.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.07% | -42.33% | +0.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.53% | -5.27% | -5.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 2.41% | +1.71% |
Volatility
VTWG vs. IVOO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF (IVOO) at 4.24%. This indicates that VTWG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTWG | IVOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 4.24% | +2.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.96% | 11.35% | +4.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.50% | 15.52% | +5.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.52% | 19.72% | +4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.21% | 21.19% | +3.02% |
VTWG vs. IVOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWG has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOO's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTWG vs. IVOO - Dividend Comparison
VTWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%, less than IVOO's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOO Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 ETF | 1.19% | 1.35% | 1.30% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 1.14% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.56% | 1.22% | 1.37% | 1.45% |
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 0.58% | 0.64% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.54% | 0.48% | 0.72% | 0.72% | 0.64% | 0.96% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTWG and IVOO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTWG has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to IVOO (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWG dropped -42.07% vs IVOO's -42.33%.
On 10-year performance, VTWG leads with 11.38% vs 11.18% for IVOO. On fees, IVOO is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOO has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VTWG has performed better with a 11.38% return vs 11.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOO is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for VTWG.
IVOO has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.58% for VTWG.
VTWG tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index, while IVOO tracks S&P MidCap 400 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VTWG and 0.10% for IVOO.
VTWG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTWG and IVOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer