VTWG vs. IJT
VTWG (Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF) and IJT (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - VTWG tracks the Russell 2000 Growth Index while IJT tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTWG returned 10.77%/yr vs 11.03%/yr for IJT. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. VTWG charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IJT.
Performance
VTWG vs. IJT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWG achieves a 17.46% return, which is significantly lower than IJT's 24.93% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTWG having a 10.77% annualized return and IJT not far ahead at 11.03%.
VTWG
- 1D
- 2.10%
- 1M
- -2.12%
- 6M
- 11.88%
- YTD
- 17.46%
- 1Y
- 33.76%
- 3Y*
- 16.31%
- 5Y*
- 5.73%
- 10Y*
- 10.77%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.91%
IJT
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 17.88%
- YTD
- 24.93%
- 1Y
- 34.82%
- 3Y*
- 15.10%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $38.87M | $35.40M | $31.70M | |
| $5.94M | $5.47M | $5.78M |
VTWG vs. IJT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 17.46% | 13.07% | 15.15% | 18.90% | -26.49% | 2.84% | 34.72% | 28.75% | -9.45% | 22.27% |
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF | 24.93% | 5.26% | 9.33% | 17.11% | -21.32% | 22.37% | 19.22% | 20.98% | -4.40% | 14.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWG and IJT is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.94 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010 | 0.93 |
The correlation between VTWG and IJT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTWG vs. IJT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTWG
IJT
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Energy
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Healthcare
VTWG
IJT
Technology
VTWG
IJT
Industrials
VTWG
IJT
Consumer Cyclical
VTWG
IJT
Financial Services
VTWG
IJT
Basic Materials
VTWG
IJT
Energy
VTWG
IJT
Real Estate
VTWG
IJT
Consumer Defensive
VTWG
IJT
Communication Services
VTWG
IJT
Utilities
VTWG
IJT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTWG vs. IJT — Risk / Return Rank
VTWG
IJT
VTWG vs. IJT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTWG | IJT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.34 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 3.85 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.86 | 13.03 | -5.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTWG vs. IJT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWG drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, smaller than the maximum IJT drawdown of -57.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWG and IJT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWG | IJT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.07% | -57.61% | +15.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.88% | -9.08% | -5.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.58% | -27.41% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.49% | -29.24% | -11.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.07% | -42.03% | -0.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.93% | -1.56% | -2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.45% | -10.25% | -0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.30% | 2.68% | +1.62% |
Volatility
VTWG vs. IJT - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) has a higher volatility of 6.26% compared to iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF (IJT) at 4.45%. This indicates that VTWG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTWG | IJT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.26% | 4.45% | +1.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.30% | 13.00% | +4.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.62% | 17.84% | +4.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 21.50% | +3.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.28% | 23.01% | +1.27% |
VTWG vs. IJT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IJT's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTWG vs. IJT - Dividend Comparison
VTWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than IJT's 0.69% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJT iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Growth ETF | 0.69% | 0.91% | 1.06% | 1.02% | 1.08% | 0.63% | 0.68% | 0.92% | 0.92% | 0.86% | 1.03% | 1.14% |
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 0.60% | 0.64% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.54% | 0.48% | 0.72% | 0.72% | 0.64% | 0.96% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTWG and IJT have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VTWG has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to IJT (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWG dropped -42.07% vs IJT's -57.61%.
On 10-year performance, IJT leads with 11.03% vs 10.77% for VTWG. On fees, VTWG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, IJT has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IJT has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 10.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTWG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for IJT.
IJT has the higher dividend yield at 0.69%, compared with 0.60% for VTWG.
VTWG tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index, while IJT tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTWG and 0.18% for IJT.
IJT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTWG and IJT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer