VTWG vs. DWAS
VTWG (Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF) and DWAS (Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTWG is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Growth Index, while DWAS is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTWG returned 12.12%/yr vs 13.88%/yr for DWAS. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTWG charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for DWAS.
Performance
VTWG vs. DWAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTWG achieves a 20.43% return, which is significantly lower than DWAS's 24.87% return. Over the past 10 years, VTWG has underperformed DWAS with an annualized return of 12.12%, while DWAS has yielded a comparatively higher 13.88% annualized return.
VTWG
- 1D
- -1.45%
- 1M
- 4.36%
- YTD
- 20.43%
- 6M
- 16.97%
- 1Y
- 40.10%
- 3Y*
- 19.34%
- 5Y*
- 5.29%
- 10Y*
- 12.12%
DWAS
- 1D
- -1.80%
- 1M
- 6.39%
- YTD
- 24.87%
- 6M
- 21.56%
- 1Y
- 45.00%
- 3Y*
- 17.62%
- 5Y*
- 6.84%
- 10Y*
- 13.88%
VTWG vs. DWAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 20.43% | 13.07% | 15.15% | 18.90% | -26.49% | 2.84% | 34.72% | 28.75% | -9.45% | 22.27% |
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 24.87% | 6.09% | 9.81% | 16.88% | -18.51% | 19.75% | 32.32% | 31.39% | -10.68% | 20.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTWG and DWAS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2012 | 0.92 |
The correlation between VTWG and DWAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTWG vs. DWAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTWG
DWAS
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
VTWG
DWAS
Industrials
VTWG
DWAS
Healthcare
VTWG
DWAS
Financial Services
VTWG
DWAS
Consumer Cyclical
VTWG
DWAS
Basic Materials
VTWG
DWAS
Energy
VTWG
DWAS
Consumer Defensive
VTWG
DWAS
Communication Services
VTWG
DWAS
Real Estate
VTWG
DWAS
Utilities
VTWG
DWAS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTWG vs. DWAS — Risk / Return Rank
VTWG
DWAS
VTWG vs. DWAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) and Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTWG | DWAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.31 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 4.51 | -1.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.72 | 14.54 | -4.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTWG vs. DWAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTWG drawdown since its inception was -42.07%, smaller than the maximum DWAS drawdown of -46.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTWG and DWAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTWG | DWAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.07% | -46.16% | +4.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.88% | -10.02% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.58% | -33.83% | +5.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.49% | -33.83% | -6.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.07% | -46.16% | +4.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.45% | -1.80% | +0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.50% | -10.27% | -0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.14% | 3.10% | +1.04% |
Volatility
VTWG vs. DWAS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF (VTWG) is 7.82%, while Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a volatility of 8.88%. This indicates that VTWG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DWAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTWG | DWAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.82% | 8.88% | -1.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.92% | 18.12% | -1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.34% | 23.99% | -1.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 25.86% | -1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.27% | 26.69% | -2.42% |
VTWG vs. DWAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTWG has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than DWAS's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTWG vs. DWAS - Dividend Comparison
VTWG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while DWAS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.00% | 0.07% | 0.79% | 1.42% | 0.81% | 0.16% | 0.21% | 0.13% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.52% | 0.19% |
VTWG Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF | 0.59% | 0.64% | 0.55% | 0.79% | 0.71% | 0.54% | 0.48% | 0.72% | 0.72% | 0.64% | 0.96% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, VTWG and DWAS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DWAS has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to VTWG (7.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTWG dropped -42.07% vs DWAS's -46.16%.
On 10-year performance, DWAS leads with 13.88% vs 12.12% for VTWG. On fees, VTWG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VTWG has been the lower-risk option at 7.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DWAS has performed better with a 13.88% return vs 12.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTWG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.
VTWG has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.00% for DWAS.
VTWG is categorized as Small Cap Growth Equities, while DWAS is Momentum. VTWG tracks Russell 2000 Growth Index, while DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTWG and 0.60% for DWAS.
DWAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTWG and DWAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer