DWAS vs. VBR
DWAS (Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF) and VBR (Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - DWAS is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while VBR is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DWAS returned 14.09%/yr vs 11.02%/yr for VBR. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. DWAS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VBR.
Performance
DWAS vs. VBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWAS achieves a 27.16% return, which is significantly higher than VBR's 13.42% return. Over the past 10 years, DWAS has outperformed VBR with an annualized return of 14.09%, while VBR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.02% annualized return.
DWAS
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- 8.34%
- YTD
- 27.16%
- 6M
- 23.04%
- 1Y
- 50.14%
- 3Y*
- 18.33%
- 5Y*
- 7.48%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
VBR
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 13.42%
- 6M
- 11.41%
- 1Y
- 27.72%
- 3Y*
- 16.95%
- 5Y*
- 8.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.02%
DWAS vs. VBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 27.16% | 6.09% | 9.81% | 16.88% | -18.51% | 19.75% | 32.32% | 31.39% | -10.68% | 20.84% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 13.42% | 9.09% | 12.40% | 16.00% | -9.38% | 28.08% | 5.90% | 22.78% | -12.28% | 11.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWAS and VBR is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2012 | 0.83 |
The correlation between DWAS and VBR shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
DWAS vs. VBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWAS
VBR
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Healthcare
DWAS
VBR
Technology
DWAS
VBR
Industrials
DWAS
VBR
Financial Services
DWAS
VBR
Energy
DWAS
VBR
Consumer Cyclical
DWAS
VBR
Basic Materials
DWAS
VBR
Consumer Defensive
DWAS
VBR
Real Estate
DWAS
VBR
Communication Services
DWAS
VBR
Utilities
DWAS
VBR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWAS vs. VBR — Risk / Return Rank
DWAS
VBR
DWAS vs. VBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DWAS | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.31 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.03 | 3.14 | +1.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.22 | 11.11 | +5.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DWAS vs. VBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, smaller than the maximum VBR drawdown of -61.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and VBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWAS | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.16% | -61.98% | +15.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -8.85% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.83% | -24.19% | -9.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.83% | -24.19% | -9.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.16% | -45.28% | -0.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.03% | +1.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.27% | -8.25% | -2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 2.50% | +0.60% |
Volatility
DWAS vs. VBR - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a higher volatility of 8.61% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF (VBR) at 3.97%. This indicates that DWAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWAS | VBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.61% | 3.97% | +4.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.05% | 10.66% | +7.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.95% | 15.33% | +8.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.85% | 19.73% | +6.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.71% | 21.75% | +4.96% |
DWAS vs. VBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VBR's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWAS vs. VBR - Dividend Comparison
DWAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than VBR's 1.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.79% | 1.42% | 0.81% | 0.16% | 0.21% | 0.13% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.52% | 0.19% |
VBR Vanguard Small-Cap Value ETF | 1.73% | 1.95% | 1.98% | 2.12% | 2.03% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.06% | 2.35% | 1.79% | 1.77% | 1.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWAS and VBR have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DWAS has higher volatility (8.61%) compared to VBR (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs VBR's -61.98%.
On 10-year performance, DWAS leads with 14.09% vs 11.02% for VBR. On fees, VBR is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, VBR has been the lower-risk option at 3.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, DWAS has performed better with a 14.09% return vs 11.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VBR is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.
VBR has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.01% for DWAS.
DWAS is categorized as Momentum, while VBR is Small Cap Value Equities. DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while VBR tracks CRSP US Small Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.05% for VBR.
DWAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWAS and VBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer