DWAS vs. MTUM
DWAS (Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF) and MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds - DWAS tracks the Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index while MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, DWAS returned 14.09%/yr vs 18.03%/yr for MTUM. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. DWAS charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MTUM.
Performance
DWAS vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DWAS achieves a 27.16% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 38.19% return. Over the past 10 years, DWAS has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 14.09%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 18.03% annualized return.
DWAS
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- 8.34%
- YTD
- 27.16%
- 6M
- 23.04%
- 1Y
- 50.14%
- 3Y*
- 18.33%
- 5Y*
- 7.48%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
MTUM
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- 13.83%
- YTD
- 38.19%
- 6M
- 36.52%
- 1Y
- 50.96%
- 3Y*
- 35.93%
- 5Y*
- 16.53%
- 10Y*
- 18.03%
DWAS vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 27.16% | 6.09% | 9.81% | 16.88% | -18.51% | 19.75% | 32.32% | 31.39% | -10.68% | 20.84% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 38.19% | 22.15% | 32.89% | 9.15% | -18.27% | 13.36% | 29.86% | 27.25% | -1.67% | 37.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between DWAS and MTUM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013 | 0.75 |
The correlation between DWAS and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
DWAS vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
DWAS
MTUM
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Communication Services
Utilities
Healthcare
DWAS
MTUM
Technology
DWAS
MTUM
Industrials
DWAS
MTUM
Financial Services
DWAS
MTUM
Energy
DWAS
MTUM
Consumer Cyclical
DWAS
MTUM
Basic Materials
DWAS
MTUM
Consumer Defensive
DWAS
MTUM
Real Estate
DWAS
MTUM
Communication Services
DWAS
MTUM
Utilities
DWAS
MTUM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DWAS vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank
DWAS
MTUM
DWAS vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| DWAS | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.43 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.03 | 4.44 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.22 | 17.05 | -0.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
DWAS vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and MTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DWAS | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.16% | -34.08% | -12.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.02% | -11.54% | +1.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.83% | -20.99% | -12.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.83% | -32.28% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.16% | -34.08% | -12.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.27% | -6.19% | -4.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 3.00% | +0.10% |
Volatility
DWAS vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) is 8.61%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 11.02%. This indicates that DWAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DWAS | MTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.61% | 11.02% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.05% | 18.88% | -0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.95% | 21.48% | +2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.85% | 21.06% | +4.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.71% | 21.28% | +5.43% |
DWAS vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
DWAS vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison
DWAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than MTUM's 0.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DWAS Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.79% | 1.42% | 0.81% | 0.16% | 0.21% | 0.13% | 0.04% | 0.20% | 0.52% | 0.19% |
MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | 0.54% | 0.91% | 0.75% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.48% | 1.27% | 1.02% | 1.43% | 1.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
DWAS and MTUM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTUM has higher volatility (11.02%) compared to DWAS (8.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs MTUM's -34.08%.
On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 18.03% vs 14.09% for DWAS. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DWAS has been the lower-risk option at 8.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 18.03% return vs 14.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.
MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.01% for DWAS.
DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.15% for MTUM.
MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DWAS and MTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer