PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWAS vs. MTUM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWAS vs. MTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWAS achieves a 27.16% return, which is significantly lower than MTUM's 38.19% return. Over the past 10 years, DWAS has underperformed MTUM with an annualized return of 14.09%, while MTUM has yielded a comparatively higher 18.03% annualized return.


DWAS

1D
1.73%
1M
8.34%
YTD
27.16%
6M
23.04%
1Y
50.14%
3Y*
18.33%
5Y*
7.48%
10Y*
14.09%

MTUM

1D
1.98%
1M
13.83%
YTD
38.19%
6M
36.52%
1Y
50.96%
3Y*
35.93%
5Y*
16.53%
10Y*
18.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DWAS vs. MTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
27.16%6.09%9.81%16.88%-18.51%19.75%32.32%31.39%-10.68%20.84%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
38.19%22.15%32.89%9.15%-18.27%13.36%29.86%27.25%-1.67%37.50%

Correlation

The correlation between DWAS and MTUM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 18, 2013

0.75

The correlation between DWAS and MTUM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWAS vs. MTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWAS
MTUM

Healthcare

25.9%
3.5%

Technology

20.9%
50.2%

Industrials

18.0%
15.0%

Financial Services

13.3%
5.0%

Energy

6.5%
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.9%
2.9%

Basic Materials

3.9%
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
3.7%

Real Estate

1.2%
1.3%

Communication Services

1.1%
5.1%

Utilities

0.3%
0.6%

Healthcare

DWAS
25.9%
MTUM
3.5%

Technology

DWAS
20.9%
MTUM
50.2%

Industrials

DWAS
18.0%
MTUM
15.0%

Financial Services

DWAS
13.3%
MTUM
5.0%

Energy

DWAS
6.5%
MTUM
10.5%

Consumer Cyclical

DWAS
5.9%
MTUM
2.9%

Basic Materials

DWAS
3.9%
MTUM
2.3%

Consumer Defensive

DWAS
3.0%
MTUM
3.7%

Real Estate

DWAS
1.2%
MTUM
1.3%

Communication Services

DWAS
1.1%
MTUM
5.1%

Utilities

DWAS
0.3%
MTUM
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWAS vs. MTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DWAS
DWAS Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DWAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWAS Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
DWAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWAS Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

MTUM
MTUM Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
MTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
MTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
MTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
MTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DWAS vs. MTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWASMTUMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.43

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.03

4.44

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.22

17.05

-0.83

DWAS vs. MTUM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWAS Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is comparable to the MTUM Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWAS and MTUM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWAS vs. MTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, which is greater than MTUM's maximum drawdown of -34.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and MTUM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWASMTUMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.16%

-34.08%

-12.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-11.54%

+1.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.83%

-20.99%

-12.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.83%

-32.28%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.16%

-34.08%

-12.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.27%

-6.19%

-4.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

3.00%

+0.10%

Volatility

DWAS vs. MTUM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) is 8.61%, while iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) has a volatility of 11.02%. This indicates that DWAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWASMTUMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.61%

11.02%

-2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.05%

18.88%

-0.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.95%

21.48%

+2.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.85%

21.06%

+4.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.71%

21.28%

+5.43%

DWAS vs. MTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than MTUM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWAS vs. MTUM - Dividend Comparison

DWAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than MTUM's 0.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.01%0.07%0.79%1.42%0.81%0.16%0.21%0.13%0.04%0.20%0.52%0.19%
MTUM
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
0.54%0.91%0.75%1.35%1.80%0.55%0.83%1.48%1.27%1.02%1.43%1.12%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWAS and MTUM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MTUM has higher volatility (11.02%) compared to DWAS (8.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs MTUM's -34.08%.

On 10-year performance, MTUM leads with 18.03% vs 14.09% for DWAS. On fees, MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, DWAS has been the lower-risk option at 8.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MTUM has performed better with a 18.03% return vs 14.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MTUM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.

MTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.54%, compared with 0.01% for DWAS.

DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.15% for MTUM.

MTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWAS and MTUM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer