PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DWAS vs. XSMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DWAS vs. XSMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DWAS achieves a 16.15% return, which is significantly lower than XSMO's 20.85% return. Over the past 10 years, DWAS has underperformed XSMO with an annualized return of 12.26%, while XSMO has yielded a comparatively higher 13.85% annualized return.


DWAS

1D
-0.37%
1M
-6.72%
6M
12.84%
YTD
16.15%
1Y
35.72%
3Y*
11.40%
5Y*
6.53%
10Y*
12.26%
ALL TIME*
11.65%

XSMO

1D
-0.23%
1M
-4.08%
6M
14.13%
YTD
20.85%
1Y
30.10%
3Y*
20.56%
5Y*
11.40%
10Y*
13.85%
ALL TIME*
9.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.14M$3.38M$2.22M
$20.63M$21.90M$21.28M

DWAS vs. XSMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
16.15%6.09%9.81%16.88%-18.51%19.75%32.32%31.39%-10.68%20.84%
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
20.85%9.80%17.45%21.55%-15.44%19.24%21.96%28.65%-3.44%23.95%

Correlation

The correlation between DWAS and XSMO is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2012

0.86

The correlation between DWAS and XSMO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

DWAS vs. XSMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
DWAS
XSMO

Healthcare

28.5%
16.9%

Technology

20.9%
17.8%

Industrials

16.6%
19.8%

Financial Services

14.1%
13.4%

Energy

5.9%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%
9.0%

Basic Materials

3.2%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.1%
4.6%

Communication Services

0.9%
4.0%

Utilities

0.3%
3.4%

Healthcare

DWAS
28.5%
XSMO
16.9%

Technology

DWAS
20.9%
XSMO
17.8%

Industrials

DWAS
16.6%
XSMO
19.8%

Financial Services

DWAS
14.1%
XSMO
13.4%

Energy

DWAS
5.9%
XSMO
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

DWAS
5.7%
XSMO
9.0%

Basic Materials

DWAS
3.2%
XSMO
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

DWAS
2.9%
XSMO
2.5%

Real Estate

DWAS
1.1%
XSMO
4.6%

Communication Services

DWAS
0.9%
XSMO
4.0%

Utilities

DWAS
0.3%
XSMO
3.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DWAS vs. XSMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

DWAS
DWAS Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
DWAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DWAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DWAS Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
DWAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DWAS Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

XSMO
XSMO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
XSMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XSMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XSMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XSMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
XSMO Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

DWAS vs. XSMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) and Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DWASXSMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.25

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

3.02

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.30

9.15

-0.86

DWAS vs. XSMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DWAS Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the XSMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DWAS and XSMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DWAS vs. XSMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DWAS drawdown since its inception was -46.16%, smaller than the maximum XSMO drawdown of -58.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DWAS and XSMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DWASXSMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.16%

-58.06%

+11.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.10%

-9.44%

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.83%

-24.76%

-9.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.83%

-29.62%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.16%

-39.39%

-6.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.72%

-7.34%

-4.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.24%

-11.07%

+0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.00%

3.11%

+0.89%

Volatility

DWAS vs. XSMO - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF (DWAS) has a higher volatility of 9.86% compared to Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF (XSMO) at 5.63%. This indicates that DWAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XSMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DWASXSMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.86%

5.63%

+4.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.50%

15.61%

+4.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.67%

19.92%

+5.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.92%

22.58%

+3.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.83%

24.13%

+2.70%

DWAS vs. XSMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

DWAS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XSMO's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

DWAS vs. XSMO - Dividend Comparison

DWAS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XSMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DWAS
Invesco DWA SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.00%0.07%0.79%1.42%0.81%0.16%0.21%0.13%0.04%0.20%0.52%0.19%
XSMO
Invesco S&P SmallCap Momentum ETF
0.55%0.75%0.63%0.96%1.19%0.30%0.82%0.69%0.66%0.27%0.30%0.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


DWAS and XSMO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DWAS has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to XSMO (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DWAS dropped -46.16% vs XSMO's -58.06%.

On 10-year performance, XSMO leads with 13.85% vs 12.26% for DWAS. On fees, XSMO is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, XSMO has been the lower-risk option at 5.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XSMO has performed better with a 13.85% return vs 12.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XSMO is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for DWAS.

XSMO has the higher dividend yield at 0.55%, compared with 0.00% for DWAS.

DWAS tracks Dorsey Wright SmallCap Technical Leaders Index, while XSMO tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for DWAS and 0.36% for XSMO.

XSMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DWAS and XSMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer