PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTTHX vs. SVBAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTTHX vs. SVBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund (VTTHX) and John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTTHX achieves a 8.47% return, which is significantly lower than SVBAX's 10.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTTHX having a 9.72% annualized return and SVBAX not far ahead at 10.05%.


VTTHX

1D
-0.60%
1M
2.70%
YTD
8.47%
6M
9.05%
1Y
20.81%
3Y*
15.64%
5Y*
7.69%
10Y*
9.72%

SVBAX

1D
-0.37%
1M
2.84%
YTD
10.17%
6M
9.97%
1Y
23.74%
3Y*
16.55%
5Y*
8.96%
10Y*
10.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTTHX vs. SVBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VTTHX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund
8.47%17.55%11.56%17.37%-16.64%12.96%14.80%22.44%-6.57%16.81%
SVBAX
John Hancock Balanced Fund
10.17%15.69%13.31%18.22%-15.79%14.49%15.97%21.28%-5.02%13.40%

Correlation

The correlation between VTTHX and SVBAX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2003

0.92

The correlation between VTTHX and SVBAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTTHX vs. SVBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTTHX
VTTHX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VTTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VTTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

SVBAX
SVBAX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SVBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SVBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTTHX vs. SVBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund (VTTHX) and John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTTHXSVBAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.55

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

4.38

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

21.63

-8.59

VTTHX vs. SVBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTTHX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the SVBAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTTHX and SVBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTTHXSVBAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.38

2.97

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.84

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

0.93

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.70

-0.17

Drawdowns

VTTHX vs. SVBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTTHX drawdown since its inception was -51.76%, which is greater than SVBAX's maximum drawdown of -40.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTTHX and SVBAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTTHXSVBAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.76%

-40.81%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.17%

-5.57%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.87%

-12.06%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.53%

-20.53%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.15%

-21.00%

-6.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.37%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.09%

-5.24%

-0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.13%

+0.50%

Volatility

VTTHX vs. SVBAX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund (VTTHX) has a higher volatility of 2.86% compared to John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX) at 2.50%. This indicates that VTTHX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTTHXSVBAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

2.50%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.19%

6.49%

+0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.91%

8.22%

+0.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.38%

10.78%

+0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.46%

10.79%

+1.67%

VTTHX vs. SVBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTTHX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SVBAX's 1.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTTHX vs. SVBAX - Dividend Comparison

VTTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, less than SVBAX's 11.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SVBAX
John Hancock Balanced Fund
11.34%12.45%3.72%1.48%1.60%2.73%1.60%2.19%8.06%3.51%1.70%4.57%
VTTHX
Vanguard Target Retirement 2035 Fund
2.72%2.96%3.12%2.47%2.71%19.52%2.50%2.33%2.69%0.16%2.77%4.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, VTTHX and SVBAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTTHX has higher volatility (2.86%) compared to SVBAX (2.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTTHX dropped -51.76% vs SVBAX's -40.81%.

SVBAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTTHX and SVBAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer