SVBAX vs. PCEF
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX) and Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF).
SVBAX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 4, 1992. PCEF is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index. It was launched on Feb 19, 2010.
Performance
SVBAX vs. PCEF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SVBAX vs. PCEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVBAX John Hancock Balanced Fund | -2.58% | 15.69% | 13.31% | 18.22% | -15.79% | 14.49% | 15.97% | 21.28% | -5.02% | 13.40% |
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF | -3.43% | 12.59% | 16.70% | 9.39% | -18.66% | 15.38% | 4.61% | 24.08% | -8.88% | 14.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SVBAX achieves a -2.58% return, which is significantly higher than PCEF's -3.43% return. Over the past 10 years, SVBAX has outperformed PCEF with an annualized return of 8.91%, while PCEF has yielded a comparatively lower 6.84% annualized return.
SVBAX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -5.47%
- YTD
- -2.58%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 14.91%
- 3Y*
- 12.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
PCEF
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- YTD
- -3.43%
- 6M
- -1.94%
- 1Y
- 8.22%
- 3Y*
- 10.45%
- 5Y*
- 4.22%
- 10Y*
- 6.84%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SVBAX vs. PCEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SVBAX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PCEF's 2.71% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SVBAX vs. PCEF — Risk / Return Rank
SVBAX
PCEF
SVBAX vs. PCEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX) and Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SVBAX | PCEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.38 | 0.61 | +0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 0.89 | +1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.16 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 0.77 | +1.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.90 | 3.65 | +5.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SVBAX | PCEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | 0.61 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.37 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.52 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.53 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between SVBAX and PCEF is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SVBAX vs. PCEF - Dividend Comparison
SVBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.82%, more than PCEF's 8.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVBAX John Hancock Balanced Fund | 12.82% | 12.45% | 3.72% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 2.73% | 1.60% | 2.19% | 8.06% | 3.51% | 1.70% | 4.57% |
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF | 8.32% | 7.96% | 8.79% | 9.86% | 8.93% | 6.67% | 7.54% | 7.12% | 8.21% | 6.96% | 7.72% | 9.18% |
Drawdowns
SVBAX vs. PCEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVBAX drawdown since its inception was -40.81%, which is greater than PCEF's maximum drawdown of -38.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVBAX and PCEF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SVBAX | PCEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.81% | -38.64% | -2.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.73% | -10.94% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.53% | -24.25% | +3.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.00% | -38.64% | +17.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.57% | -6.00% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.26% | -4.51% | -0.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.56% | 2.30% | -0.74% |
Volatility
SVBAX vs. PCEF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX) is 3.23%, while Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) has a volatility of 5.03%. This indicates that SVBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SVBAX | PCEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.23% | 5.03% | -1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.04% | 7.05% | -1.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.07% | 13.49% | -2.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.70% | 11.42% | -0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.74% | 13.25% | -2.51% |