SVBAX vs. PCEF
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX) and Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF).
SVBAX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 4, 1992. PCEF is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S-Network Composite Closed-End Fund Index. It was launched on Feb 19, 2010.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: SVBAX or PCEF.
Correlation
The correlation between SVBAX and PCEF is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
SVBAX vs. PCEF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
SVBAX:
0.07
PCEF:
0.67
SVBAX:
0.18
PCEF:
0.95
SVBAX:
1.02
PCEF:
1.17
SVBAX:
0.06
PCEF:
0.63
SVBAX:
0.25
PCEF:
3.43
SVBAX:
3.37%
PCEF:
2.58%
SVBAX:
11.61%
PCEF:
13.25%
SVBAX:
-40.82%
PCEF:
-38.64%
SVBAX:
-9.94%
PCEF:
-9.14%
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with SVBAX having a -5.17% return and PCEF slightly higher at -5.02%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SVBAX having a 5.09% annualized return and PCEF not far ahead at 5.16%.
SVBAX
-5.17%
-4.17%
-6.54%
1.05%
7.20%
5.09%
PCEF
-5.02%
-5.66%
-5.37%
8.56%
7.46%
5.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SVBAX vs. PCEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
SVBAX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PCEF's 2.34% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
SVBAX vs. PCEF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
SVBAX
PCEF
SVBAX vs. PCEF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX) and Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
SVBAX vs. PCEF - Dividend Comparison
SVBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than PCEF's 9.34% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SVBAX John Hancock Balanced Fund | 1.71% | 1.52% | 1.49% | 1.60% | 1.07% | 1.32% | 1.49% | 1.91% | 1.65% | 1.71% | 2.10% | 2.15% |
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF | 9.34% | 8.79% | 9.86% | 8.93% | 6.67% | 7.54% | 7.12% | 8.21% | 6.96% | 7.72% | 9.18% | 8.02% |
Drawdowns
SVBAX vs. PCEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SVBAX drawdown since its inception was -40.82%, which is greater than PCEF's maximum drawdown of -38.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SVBAX and PCEF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
SVBAX vs. PCEF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Balanced Fund (SVBAX) is 7.66%, while Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) has a volatility of 10.71%. This indicates that SVBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.