VTP vs. VGT
VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VTP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
VTP vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTP achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than VGT's 31.64% return.
VTP
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGT
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 18.07%
- YTD
- 31.64%
- 6M
- 30.51%
- 1Y
- 60.15%
- 3Y*
- 33.48%
- 5Y*
- 22.23%
- 10Y*
- 25.78%
VTP vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.55% | 2.27% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 31.64% | 11.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTP and VGT is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTP vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
VTP
VGT
VTP vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTP | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.89 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.68 | +0.63 |
Drawdowns
VTP vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTP drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum VGT drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTP and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTP | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -54.63% | +52.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -27.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -1.48% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -7.95% | +7.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.13% | — |
Volatility
VTP vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTP | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.26% | 20.57% | -17.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.26% | 25.18% | -21.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.26% | 24.60% | -21.34% |
VTP vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTP vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
VTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, more than VGT's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.31% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.61% | 1.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTP and VGT have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for VGT.
VTP has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.31% for VGT.
VTP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while VGT is Technology Equities. VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VTP and 0.09% for VGT.
Find the right allocation for VTP and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer