VTP vs. USL
VTP (Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) and USL (United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - VTP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while USL is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. VTP charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for USL.
Performance
VTP vs. USL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTP achieves a 1.55% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 63.07% return.
VTP
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USL
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- 63.07%
- 6M
- 59.66%
- 1Y
- 57.86%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 17.41%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
VTP vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.55% | 2.27% |
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 63.07% | -8.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTP and USL is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | -0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTP vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank
VTP
USL
VTP vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTP) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTP | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.58 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 0.01 | +1.30 |
Drawdowns
VTP vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTP drawdown since its inception was -1.92%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTP and USL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTP | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.92% | -89.06% | +87.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.76% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.33% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.82% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -66.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.30% | -38.16% | +37.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.52% | -61.46% | +60.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.27% | — |
Volatility
VTP vs. USL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTP | USL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.26% | 28.54% | -25.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.26% | 30.08% | -26.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.26% | 32.35% | -29.09% |
VTP vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTP has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTP vs. USL - Dividend Comparison
VTP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
USL United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTP Vanguard Total Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.61% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTP and USL have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.
VTP has the higher dividend yield at 1.61%, compared with 0.00% for USL.
VTP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while USL is Oil & Gas. VTP tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VTP and 0.88% for USL.
Find the right allocation for VTP and USL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer