VTIP vs. GLTR
VTIP (Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF) and GLTR (abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Year Index, while GLTR is a Precious Metals fund tracking the ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTIP returned 3.09%/yr vs 12.08%/yr for GLTR. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VTIP charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GLTR.
Performance
VTIP vs. GLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTIP achieves a 1.85% return, which is significantly higher than GLTR's -4.66% return. Over the past 10 years, VTIP has underperformed GLTR with an annualized return of 3.09%, while GLTR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.08% annualized return.
VTIP
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 1.85%
- 6M
- 1.95%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.25%
- 5Y*
- 3.37%
- 10Y*
- 3.09%
GLTR
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- -13.34%
- YTD
- -4.66%
- 6M
- 0.76%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 29.97%
- 5Y*
- 14.04%
- 10Y*
- 12.08%
VTIP vs. GLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 1.85% | 6.07% | 4.74% | 4.62% | -2.94% | 5.36% | 4.95% | 4.86% | 0.56% | 0.82% |
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | -4.66% | 87.25% | 20.63% | 2.01% | -0.25% | -9.60% | 29.52% | 20.96% | -2.85% | 12.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTIP and GLTR is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 16, 2012 | 0.32 |
The correlation between VTIP and GLTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (1 year) to 0.36 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTIP vs. GLTR — Risk / Return Rank
VTIP
GLTR
VTIP vs. GLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) and abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTIP | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.22 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.57 | 1.17 | +5.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.36 | 2.88 | +22.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTIP vs. GLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTIP drawdown since its inception was -6.27%, smaller than the maximum GLTR drawdown of -55.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTIP and GLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTIP | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.27% | -55.70% | +49.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.70% | -34.09% | +33.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.98% | -34.09% | +33.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.50% | -34.09% | +28.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.27% | -34.09% | +27.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -31.27% | +31.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.04% | -28.82% | +27.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.18% | 13.86% | -13.68% |
Volatility
VTIP vs. GLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF (VTIP) is 0.40%, while abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF (GLTR) has a volatility of 10.43%. This indicates that VTIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTIP | GLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.40% | 10.43% | -10.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.04% | 36.24% | -35.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.50% | 38.40% | -36.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.77% | 23.87% | -21.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.74% | 20.64% | -17.90% |
VTIP vs. GLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTIP has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than GLTR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTIP vs. GLTR - Dividend Comparison
VTIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.59%, while GLTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GLTR abrdn Physical Precious Metals Basket Shares ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTIP Vanguard Short-Term Inflation-Protected Securities ETF | 3.59% | 3.81% | 2.70% | 2.86% | 6.84% | 4.68% | 1.20% | 1.95% | 2.45% | 1.52% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTIP and GLTR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLTR has higher volatility (10.43%) compared to VTIP (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTIP dropped -6.27% vs GLTR's -55.70%.
On 10-year performance, GLTR leads with 12.08% vs 3.09% for VTIP. On fees, VTIP is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GLTR has performed better with a 12.08% return vs 3.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTIP is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GLTR.
VTIP has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.00% for GLTR.
VTIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while GLTR is Precious Metals. VTIP tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Year Index, while GLTR tracks ETFS Physical Precious Metals Basket Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and abrdn. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTIP and 0.60% for GLTR.
VTIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTIP and GLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer