VTI vs. PKB
VTI (Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF) and PKB (Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTI is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Total Market Index, while PKB is a Building & Construction fund tracking the Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VTI returned 15.23%/yr vs 15.86%/yr for PKB. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTI charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PKB.
Performance
VTI vs. PKB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTI achieves a 11.46% return, which is significantly lower than PKB's 16.22% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VTI having a 15.23% annualized return and PKB not far ahead at 15.86%.
VTI
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 11.46%
- 6M
- 11.76%
- 1Y
- 28.40%
- 3Y*
- 20.94%
- 5Y*
- 12.71%
- 10Y*
- 15.23%
PKB
- 1D
- 1.66%
- 1M
- 5.36%
- YTD
- 16.22%
- 6M
- 11.91%
- 1Y
- 39.97%
- 3Y*
- 28.24%
- 5Y*
- 17.52%
- 10Y*
- 15.86%
VTI vs. PKB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 11.46% | 17.10% | 23.81% | 26.05% | -19.52% | 25.68% | 21.08% | 30.67% | -5.23% | 21.21% |
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 16.22% | 22.47% | 20.24% | 55.29% | -24.88% | 32.96% | 24.49% | 40.15% | -31.11% | 24.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTI and PKB is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2005 | 0.81 |
The correlation between VTI and PKB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTI vs. PKB - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTI
PKB
Technology
-
Financial Services
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
VTI
PKB
-
Financial Services
VTI
PKB
Communication Services
VTI
PKB
-
Consumer Cyclical
VTI
PKB
Industrials
VTI
PKB
Healthcare
VTI
PKB
-
Consumer Defensive
VTI
PKB
-
Energy
VTI
PKB
Utilities
VTI
PKB
Real Estate
VTI
PKB
-
Basic Materials
VTI
PKB
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTI vs. PKB — Risk / Return Rank
VTI
PKB
VTI vs. PKB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) and Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTI | PKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.28 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 2.61 | +0.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.35 | 8.26 | +6.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTI vs. PKB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTI drawdown since its inception was -55.45%, smaller than the maximum PKB drawdown of -65.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTI and PKB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTI | PKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.45% | -65.21% | +9.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -15.41% | +6.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.30% | -29.75% | +10.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.36% | -34.85% | +9.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.00% | -52.29% | +17.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.49% | -2.73% | +2.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.02% | -15.75% | +7.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 4.85% | -2.87% |
Volatility
VTI vs. PKB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is 4.74%, while Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) has a volatility of 8.82%. This indicates that VTI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PKB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTI | PKB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.74% | 8.82% | -4.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.94% | 18.70% | -8.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.69% | 23.78% | -11.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.49% | 25.79% | -8.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.34% | 27.30% | -8.96% |
VTI vs. PKB - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTI has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than PKB's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTI vs. PKB - Dividend Comparison
VTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, more than PKB's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PKB Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF | 0.14% | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.33% | 0.43% | 0.25% | 0.30% | 0.37% | 0.54% | 0.17% | 0.31% | 0.11% |
VTI Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF | 1.01% | 1.12% | 1.27% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.21% | 1.42% | 1.78% | 2.04% | 1.71% | 1.92% | 1.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTI and PKB have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PKB has higher volatility (8.82%) compared to VTI (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTI dropped -55.45% vs PKB's -65.21%.
On 10-year performance, PKB leads with 15.86% vs 15.23% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PKB has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 15.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PKB.
VTI has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.14% for PKB.
VTI is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while PKB is Building & Construction. VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index, while PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTI and 0.60% for PKB.
VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTI and PKB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer