VTHR vs. FMAY
VTHR (Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF) and FMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - VTHR tracks the Russell 3000 Index while FMAY tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VTHR returned 12.66%/yr vs 9.48%/yr for FMAY. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VTHR charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for FMAY.
Performance
VTHR vs. FMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTHR achieves a 10.94% return, which is significantly higher than FMAY's 5.39% return.
VTHR
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 4.88%
- YTD
- 10.94%
- 6M
- 10.83%
- 1Y
- 27.71%
- 3Y*
- 21.93%
- 5Y*
- 12.66%
- 10Y*
- 14.95%
FMAY
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 1.63%
- YTD
- 5.39%
- 6M
- 6.32%
- 1Y
- 15.38%
- 3Y*
- 14.13%
- 5Y*
- 9.48%
- 10Y*
- —
VTHR vs. FMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | 10.94% | 16.99% | 23.57% | 25.92% | -19.20% | 25.49% | 31.93% |
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May | 5.39% | 12.69% | 14.45% | 17.83% | -8.08% | 11.00% | 10.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTHR and FMAY is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020 | 0.93 |
The correlation between VTHR and FMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
VTHR vs. FMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VTHR
FMAY
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Utilities
Basic Materials
Technology
VTHR
FMAY
Financial Services
VTHR
FMAY
Communication Services
VTHR
FMAY
Consumer Cyclical
VTHR
FMAY
Industrials
VTHR
FMAY
Healthcare
VTHR
FMAY
Consumer Defensive
VTHR
FMAY
Energy
VTHR
FMAY
Real Estate
VTHR
FMAY
Utilities
VTHR
FMAY
Basic Materials
VTHR
FMAY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTHR vs. FMAY — Risk / Return Rank
VTHR
FMAY
VTHR vs. FMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VTHR | FMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.54 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.12 | 3.66 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.34 | 21.48 | -7.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTHR | FMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 2.56 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.90 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.86 | 1.02 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
VTHR vs. FMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTHR drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, which is greater than FMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTHR and FMAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTHR | FMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.61% | -13.60% | -21.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.91% | -4.22% | -4.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.36% | -13.12% | -6.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.06% | -13.60% | -11.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -0.38% | -0.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -2.01% | -2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 0.72% | +1.22% |
Volatility
VTHR vs. FMAY - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) at 1.02%. This indicates that VTHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTHR | FMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.98% | 1.02% | +1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.28% | 4.59% | +4.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.30% | 6.04% | +6.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.30% | 10.59% | +6.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.84% | 10.15% | +7.69% |
VTHR vs. FMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTHR has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
VTHR vs. FMAY - Dividend Comparison
VTHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while FMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTHR Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF | 1.00% | 1.08% | 1.19% | 1.47% | 1.52% | 1.16% | 1.37% | 1.65% | 1.89% | 1.63% | 1.82% | 1.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, VTHR and FMAY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VTHR has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to FMAY (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTHR dropped -34.61% vs FMAY's -13.60%.
On 5-year performance, VTHR leads with 12.66% vs 9.48% for FMAY. On fees, VTHR is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, FMAY has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VTHR has performed better with a 12.66% return vs 9.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VTHR is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FMAY.
VTHR has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for FMAY.
VTHR tracks Russell 3000 Index, while FMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VTHR and 0.85% for FMAY.
FMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VTHR and FMAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer