PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTHR vs. FMAY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTHR vs. FMAY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTHR achieves a 10.94% return, which is significantly higher than FMAY's 5.39% return.


VTHR

1D
-0.70%
1M
4.88%
YTD
10.94%
6M
10.83%
1Y
27.71%
3Y*
21.93%
5Y*
12.66%
10Y*
14.95%

FMAY

1D
-0.38%
1M
1.63%
YTD
5.39%
6M
6.32%
1Y
15.38%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTHR vs. FMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VTHR
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF
10.94%16.99%23.57%25.92%-19.20%25.49%31.93%
FMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May
5.39%12.69%14.45%17.83%-8.08%11.00%10.91%

Correlation

The correlation between VTHR and FMAY is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020

0.93

The correlation between VTHR and FMAY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTHR vs. FMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTHR
FMAY

Technology

33.1%
36.2%

Financial Services

12.1%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.5%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
10.1%

Industrials

9.6%
8.1%

Healthcare

9.1%
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
4.9%

Energy

3.8%
3.5%

Real Estate

2.4%
1.9%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Basic Materials

2.2%
1.8%

Technology

VTHR
33.1%
FMAY
36.2%

Financial Services

VTHR
12.1%
FMAY
11.9%

Communication Services

VTHR
10.5%
FMAY
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VTHR
10.2%
FMAY
10.1%

Industrials

VTHR
9.6%
FMAY
8.1%

Healthcare

VTHR
9.1%
FMAY
8.4%

Consumer Defensive

VTHR
4.7%
FMAY
4.9%

Energy

VTHR
3.8%
FMAY
3.5%

Real Estate

VTHR
2.4%
FMAY
1.9%

Utilities

VTHR
2.3%
FMAY
2.3%

Basic Materials

VTHR
2.2%
FMAY
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTHR vs. FMAY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTHR
VTHR Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
VTHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTHR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
VTHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTHR Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FMAY
FMAY Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FMAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMAY Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FMAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMAY Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTHR vs. FMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTHRFMAYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.54

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

3.66

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.34

21.48

-7.14

VTHR vs. FMAY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTHR Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is comparable to the FMAY Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTHR and FMAY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTHRFMAYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.27

2.56

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.90

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

1.02

-0.17

Drawdowns

VTHR vs. FMAY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTHR drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, which is greater than FMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTHR and FMAY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTHRFMAYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.61%

-13.60%

-21.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-4.22%

-4.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.36%

-13.12%

-6.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.06%

-13.60%

-11.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.38%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-2.01%

-2.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

0.72%

+1.22%

Volatility

VTHR vs. FMAY - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) has a higher volatility of 2.98% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May (FMAY) at 1.02%. This indicates that VTHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTHRFMAYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.98%

1.02%

+1.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.28%

4.59%

+4.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.30%

6.04%

+6.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.30%

10.59%

+6.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.84%

10.15%

+7.69%

VTHR vs. FMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTHR has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

VTHR vs. FMAY - Dividend Comparison

VTHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, while FMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FMAY
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - May
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTHR
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF
1.00%1.08%1.19%1.47%1.52%1.16%1.37%1.65%1.89%1.63%1.82%1.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, VTHR and FMAY move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VTHR has higher volatility (2.98%) compared to FMAY (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTHR dropped -34.61% vs FMAY's -13.60%.

On 5-year performance, VTHR leads with 12.66% vs 9.48% for FMAY. On fees, VTHR is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, FMAY has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VTHR has performed better with a 12.66% return vs 9.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTHR is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FMAY.

VTHR has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.00% for FMAY.

VTHR tracks Russell 3000 Index, while FMAY tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index May Series. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VTHR and 0.85% for FMAY.

FMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTHR and FMAY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer