PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTHR vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTHR vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTHR achieves a 8.70% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 7.57% return.


VTHR

1D
-1.34%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
8.70%
6M
7.51%
1Y
23.90%
3Y*
20.48%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*
15.06%

BBUS

1D
-1.68%
1M
-1.53%
YTD
7.57%
6M
6.62%
1Y
22.78%
3Y*
20.70%
5Y*
12.52%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTHR vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VTHR
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF
8.70%16.99%23.57%25.92%-19.20%25.49%20.93%16.44%
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
7.57%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VTHR and BBUS is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.98

The correlation between VTHR and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

VTHR vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VTHR
BBUS

Technology

36.5%
38.1%

Financial Services

11.4%
11.2%

Communication Services

10.0%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
9.1%

Industrials

9.2%
7.4%

Healthcare

8.9%
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%
4.4%

Energy

3.4%
3.0%

Real Estate

2.3%
1.7%

Utilities

2.1%
2.6%

Basic Materials

2.0%
1.2%

Technology

VTHR
36.5%
BBUS
38.1%

Financial Services

VTHR
11.4%
BBUS
11.2%

Communication Services

VTHR
10.0%
BBUS
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VTHR
9.9%
BBUS
9.1%

Industrials

VTHR
9.2%
BBUS
7.4%

Healthcare

VTHR
8.9%
BBUS
8.0%

Consumer Defensive

VTHR
4.3%
BBUS
4.4%

Energy

VTHR
3.4%
BBUS
3.0%

Real Estate

VTHR
2.3%
BBUS
1.7%

Utilities

VTHR
2.1%
BBUS
2.6%

Basic Materials

VTHR
2.0%
BBUS
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTHR vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTHR
VTHR Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
VTHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTHR Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VTHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTHR Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTHR vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTHRBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.33

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.69

2.49

+0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.99

10.97

+1.02

VTHR vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTHR Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTHR and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTHR vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTHR drawdown since its inception was -34.61%, roughly equal to the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTHR and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTHRBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.61%

-35.35%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-9.21%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.36%

-19.01%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.06%

-25.46%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-3.47%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.03%

-5.43%

+1.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

2.08%

-0.08%

Volatility

VTHR vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF (VTHR) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) have volatilities of 4.78% and 5.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTHRBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

5.00%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

9.95%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.87%

12.59%

+0.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

17.14%

+0.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.86%

19.59%

-1.73%

VTHR vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTHR has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTHR vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

VTHR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, more than BBUS's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
1.01%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTHR
Vanguard Russell 3000 ETF
1.05%1.08%1.19%1.47%1.52%1.16%1.37%1.65%1.89%1.63%1.82%1.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, VTHR and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBUS has higher volatility (5.00%) compared to VTHR (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTHR dropped -34.61% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 12.52% vs 11.91% for VTHR. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, VTHR has been the lower-risk option at 4.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 12.52% return vs 11.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VTHR.

VTHR has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 1.01% for BBUS.

VTHR tracks Russell 3000 Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VTHR and 0.02% for BBUS.

VTHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTHR and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer