VTG vs. SCHG
VTG (Vanguard Total Treasury ETF) and SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTG is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index, while SCHG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VTG charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHG.
Performance
VTG vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTG achieves a 0.02% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 2.76% return.
VTG
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 0.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- 2.76%
- 6M
- 2.11%
- 1Y
- 20.89%
- 3Y*
- 22.70%
- 5Y*
- 13.68%
- 10Y*
- 18.81%
VTG vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF | 0.02% | 3.07% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 2.76% | 12.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTG and SCHG is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.20 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTG vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
VTG
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHG
VTG vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VTG | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.23 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.28 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VTG vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTG drawdown since its inception was -2.89%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTG and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTG | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.89% | -34.59% | +31.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.77% | -5.16% | +3.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.78% | -5.20% | +4.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.00% | — |
Volatility
VTG vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTG | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.78% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.52% | 16.21% | -12.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.52% | 22.37% | -18.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.52% | 21.61% | -18.09% |
VTG vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
VTG has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTG vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
VTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, more than SCHG's 0.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.38% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF | 3.20% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VTG and SCHG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for SCHG.
VTG has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 0.38% for SCHG.
VTG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while SCHG is Large Cap Growth Equities. VTG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index, while SCHG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VTG and 0.04% for SCHG.
Find the right allocation for VTG and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer