VTG vs. BND
VTG (Vanguard Total Treasury ETF) and BND (Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VTG is a Intermediate Core Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index, while BND is a Total Bond Market fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.03% expense ratio.
Performance
VTG vs. BND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VTG achieves a 0.01% return, which is significantly lower than BND's 0.41% return.
VTG
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.01%
- 6M
- 0.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BND
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 4.60%
- 3Y*
- 4.01%
- 5Y*
- 0.11%
- 10Y*
- 1.61%
VTG vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF | 0.01% | 2.88% |
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 0.41% | 3.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between VTG and BND is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VTG vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank
VTG
BND
VTG vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Treasury ETF (VTG) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VTG | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.02 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.29 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 0.59 | +0.33 |
Drawdowns
VTG vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VTG drawdown since its inception was -2.89%, smaller than the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTG and BND.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VTG | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.89% | -18.58% | +15.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.91% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.78% | -2.23% | +0.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.74% | -3.06% | +2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.89% | — |
Volatility
VTG vs. BND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VTG | BND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.22% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.51% | 3.78% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.51% | 6.02% | -2.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.51% | 5.53% | -2.02% |
VTG vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VTG and BND have an expense ratio of 0.03%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VTG vs. BND - Dividend Comparison
VTG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%, less than BND's 3.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BND Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF | 3.96% | 3.86% | 3.67% | 3.09% | 2.60% | 2.12% | 2.38% | 2.72% | 2.81% | 2.54% | 2.51% | 2.57% |
VTG Vanguard Total Treasury ETF | 3.20% | 1.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, VTG and BND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.03% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTG and BND have the same expense ratio: 0.03% per year.
BND has the higher dividend yield at 3.96%, compared with 3.20% for VTG.
VTG is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while BND is Total Bond Market. VTG tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Total Return Unhedged USD Index, while BND tracks Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Float Adjusted Index.
Find the right allocation for VTG and BND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer