PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTES vs. VYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTES vs. VYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares (VTES) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTES achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly lower than VYM's 12.47% return.


VTES

1D
0.01%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.66%
6M
1.02%
1Y
3.63%
3Y*
3.23%
5Y*
10Y*

VYM

1D
-0.43%
1M
3.38%
YTD
12.47%
6M
12.01%
1Y
26.16%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
11.48%
10Y*
11.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VTES vs. VYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VTES
Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares
0.66%4.19%1.85%3.32%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
12.47%15.42%17.60%10.49%

Correlation

The correlation between VTES and VYM is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTES vs. VYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VTES
VTES Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTES Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
VTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTES Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

VYM
VYM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VTES vs. VYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares (VTES) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VTESVYMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.94

2.56

+0.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.26

3.65

+0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.46

+0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

3.93

-1.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.36

14.76

-7.39

VTES vs. VYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTES Sharpe Ratio is 2.94, which is comparable to the VYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTES and VYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VTESVYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.94

2.56

+0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.81

0.51

+1.30

Drawdowns

VTES vs. VYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTES drawdown since its inception was -2.42%, smaller than the maximum VYM drawdown of -56.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTES and VYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTESVYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-56.98%

+54.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-6.69%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.80%

-14.46%

+12.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.62%

-0.43%

-0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.50%

-7.19%

+6.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.49%

1.78%

-1.29%

Volatility

VTES vs. VYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares (VTES) is 0.35%, while Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that VTES experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTESVYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.35%

2.77%

-2.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.97%

7.67%

-6.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24%

10.28%

-9.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.72%

13.96%

-12.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.72%

16.34%

-14.62%

VTES vs. VYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTES has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VYM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTES vs. VYM - Dividend Comparison

VTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than VYM's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VTES
Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF Shares
2.75%2.77%2.99%2.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VYM
Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
2.19%2.44%2.74%3.12%3.01%2.76%3.18%3.03%3.40%2.80%2.91%3.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTES and VYM have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VYM has higher volatility (2.77%) compared to VTES (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTES dropped -2.42% vs VYM's -56.98%.

On 3-year performance, VYM leads with 18.88% vs 3.23% for VTES. On fees, VYM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, VTES has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VYM has performed better with a 18.88% return vs 3.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VYM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VTES.

VTES has the higher dividend yield at 2.75%, compared with 2.19% for VYM.

VTES is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while VYM is Dividend. VTES tracks S&P 0-7 Yr National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while VYM tracks FTSE High Dividend Yield Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VTES and 0.04% for VYM.

VTES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTES and VYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer