PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VTES vs. VGSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VTES vs. VGSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTES) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VTES achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly lower than VGSH's 0.77% return.


VTES

1D
-0.04%
1M
-0.61%
6M
-0.36%
YTD
0.37%
1Y
1.66%
3Y*
2.94%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.86%

VGSH

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.03%
6M
0.55%
YTD
0.77%
1Y
2.58%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
1.87%
10Y*
1.73%
ALL TIME*
1.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$133.56M$160.92M$191.51M
$19.78M$19.18M$17.67M

VTES vs. VGSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VTES
Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
0.37%4.19%1.85%3.32%
VGSH
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF
0.77%5.07%4.00%4.77%

Correlation

The correlation between VTES and VGSH is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2023

0.55

The correlation between VTES and VGSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VTES vs. VGSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VTES
VTES Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
VTES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTES Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTES Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VTES Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTES Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

VGSH
VGSH Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
VGSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGSH Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
VGSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGSH Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VTES vs. VGSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTES) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTESVGSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.81

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.49

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

3.51

-2.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.68

13.46

-9.79

VTES vs. VGSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VTES Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the VGSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VTES and VGSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VTES vs. VGSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VTES drawdown since its inception was -2.42%, smaller than the maximum VGSH drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VTES and VGSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTESVGSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-5.70%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.47%

-0.88%

-0.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.59%

-0.97%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-0.05%

-0.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.50%

-0.59%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.55%

0.23%

+0.32%

Volatility

VTES vs. VGSH - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VTES) has a higher volatility of 0.45% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) at 0.36%. This indicates that VTES's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTESVGSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.45%

0.36%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.03%

1.01%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.31%

1.32%

-0.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.70%

1.98%

-0.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.70%

1.58%

+0.12%

VTES vs. VGSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

VTES has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VGSH's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VTES vs. VGSH - Dividend Comparison

VTES's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than VGSH's 3.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGSH
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF
3.50%4.00%4.18%3.31%1.15%0.66%1.74%2.28%1.79%1.10%0.84%0.69%
VTES
Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
2.52%2.77%2.99%2.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VTES and VGSH have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTES has higher volatility (0.45%) compared to VGSH (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VTES dropped -2.42% vs VGSH's -5.70%.

On 3-year performance, VGSH leads with 4.29% vs 2.94% for VTES. On fees, VGSH is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, VGSH has performed better with a 4.29% return vs 2.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGSH is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for VTES.

VGSH has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 2.52% for VTES.

VTES is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while VGSH is Government Bonds. VTES tracks S&P 0-7 Year National AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index, while VGSH tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VTES and 0.03% for VGSH.

VGSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VTES and VGSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer