VT vs. VEA
VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and VEA (Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while VEA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VT returned 12.74%/yr vs 10.17%/yr for VEA. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VEA.
Performance
VT vs. VEA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 12.24% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.92% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 12.74%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.17% annualized return.
VT
- 1D
- -0.88%
- 1M
- 4.91%
- YTD
- 12.24%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 29.24%
- 3Y*
- 20.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.99%
- 10Y*
- 12.74%
VEA
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 5.54%
- YTD
- 14.92%
- 6M
- 18.15%
- 1Y
- 32.48%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 9.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.17%
VT vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 12.24% | 22.43% | 16.49% | 22.02% | -18.00% | 18.27% | 16.59% | 26.81% | -9.76% | 24.50% |
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 14.92% | 35.16% | 3.15% | 17.93% | -15.34% | 11.66% | 9.71% | 22.62% | -14.75% | 26.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between VT and VEA is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2008 | 0.93 |
The correlation between VT and VEA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
VT vs. VEA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VT
VEA
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VT
VEA
Financial Services
VT
VEA
Industrials
VT
VEA
Consumer Cyclical
VT
VEA
Communication Services
VT
VEA
Healthcare
VT
VEA
Consumer Defensive
VT
VEA
Energy
VT
VEA
Basic Materials
VT
VEA
Utilities
VT
VEA
Real Estate
VT
VEA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VT vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank
VT
VEA
VT vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VT | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.38 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 2.81 | +0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.53 | 10.94 | +2.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VT | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.31 | 2.09 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.69 | 0.58 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.59 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.25 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
VT vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and VEA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VT | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.27% | -60.68% | +10.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -11.63% | +1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.51% | -13.45% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.38% | -29.71% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.24% | -35.73% | +1.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -0.90% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -13.29% | +6.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.17% | 2.98% | -0.81% |
Volatility
VT vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is 3.83%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 5.66%. This indicates that VT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VT | VEA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.83% | 5.66% | -1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.17% | 13.32% | -3.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.70% | 15.66% | -2.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 16.55% | -0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.23% | 17.36% | -0.13% |
VT vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison
VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VT vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison
VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VEA Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF | 2.62% | 3.22% | 3.35% | 3.15% | 2.91% | 3.16% | 2.04% | 3.04% | 3.35% | 2.77% | 3.05% | 2.92% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.59% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, VT and VEA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VEA has higher volatility (5.66%) compared to VT (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs VEA's -60.68%.
On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.74% vs 10.17% for VEA. On fees, VEA is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VT has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.74% return vs 10.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VEA is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for VT.
VEA has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.59% for VT.
VT is categorized as Global Equities, while VEA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while VEA tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex US Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.03% for VEA.
VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VT and VEA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer