PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VT vs. SCHH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VT vs. SCHH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 11.06% return, which is significantly lower than SCHH's 16.33% return. Over the past 10 years, VT has outperformed SCHH with an annualized return of 12.93%, while SCHH has yielded a comparatively lower 4.51% annualized return.


VT

1D
0.44%
1M
0.57%
YTD
11.06%
6M
11.82%
1Y
25.83%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
12.93%

SCHH

1D
1.00%
1M
3.20%
YTD
16.33%
6M
16.33%
1Y
15.97%
3Y*
11.02%
5Y*
3.40%
10Y*
4.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. SCHH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
11.06%22.43%16.49%22.02%-18.00%18.27%16.59%26.81%-9.76%24.50%
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
16.33%2.20%4.99%11.18%-24.99%41.07%-14.81%22.85%-4.26%3.68%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and SCHH is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011

0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between VT and SCHH has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VT vs. SCHH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VT
SCHH

Technology

27.8%

-

Financial Services

15.9%
0.2%

Industrials

12.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%

-

Communication Services

8.3%

-

Healthcare

8.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.8%

-

Energy

4.3%

-

Basic Materials

4.2%
1.3%

Utilities

2.7%

-

Real Estate

2.4%
98.5%

Technology

VT
27.8%
SCHH

-

Financial Services

VT
15.9%
SCHH
0.2%

Industrials

VT
12.0%
SCHH

-

Consumer Cyclical

VT
9.5%
SCHH

-

Communication Services

VT
8.3%
SCHH

-

Healthcare

VT
8.1%
SCHH

-

Consumer Defensive

VT
4.8%
SCHH

-

Energy

VT
4.3%
SCHH

-

Basic Materials

VT
4.2%
SCHH
1.3%

Utilities

VT
2.7%
SCHH

-

Real Estate

VT
2.4%
SCHH
98.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VT vs. SCHH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHH
SCHH Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
SCHH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHH Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHH Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. SCHH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VTSCHHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.21

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

1.94

+0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.67

6.10

+5.57

VT vs. SCHH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VT Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the SCHH Sharpe Ratio of 1.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VT and SCHH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VT vs. SCHH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than SCHH's maximum drawdown of -44.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and SCHH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VTSCHHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.27%

-44.22%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-8.28%

-1.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.51%

-17.76%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

-33.28%

+6.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

-44.22%

+9.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

0.00%

-1.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.01%

-9.43%

+2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

2.63%

-0.41%

Volatility

VT vs. SCHH - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a higher volatility of 5.26% compared to Schwab US REIT ETF (SCHH) at 4.83%. This indicates that VT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VTSCHHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.26%

4.83%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.01%

9.98%

+1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.38%

13.56%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

18.74%

-2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.27%

20.99%

-3.72%

VT vs. SCHH - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHH's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VT vs. SCHH - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than SCHH's 2.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHH
Schwab US REIT ETF
2.69%3.04%3.22%3.24%2.55%1.50%2.86%2.86%3.64%2.22%2.81%2.48%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.61%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VT and SCHH have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VT has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to SCHH (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VT dropped -50.27% vs SCHH's -44.22%.

On 10-year performance, VT leads with 12.93% vs 4.51% for SCHH. On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHH has been the lower-risk option at 4.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VT has performed better with a 12.93% return vs 4.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for SCHH.

SCHH has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 1.61% for VT.

VT is categorized as Global Equities, while SCHH is REIT. VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index, while SCHH tracks Dow Jones Equity All REIT Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.07% for SCHH.

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VT and SCHH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer