VT vs. POW

Last updated Jul 11, 2026

VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) and POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index, while POW is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by VistaShares. VT is passively managed, while POW is actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VT charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for POW.

Performance

VT vs. POW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VT achieves a 12.41% return, which is significantly lower than POW's 44.11% return.

VT

• 1D: 0.40%
• 1M: 4.13%
• 6M: 9.67%
• YTD: 12.41%
• 1Y: 23.49%
• 3Y*: 19.87%
• 5Y*: 10.78%
• 10Y*: 12.58%

POW

• 1D: 1.25%
• 1M: -1.05%
• 6M: 39.04%
• YTD: 44.11%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VT vs. POW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	12.41%	0.36%
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	44.11%	-1.70%

Correlation

The correlation between VT and POW is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.73

Return for Risk

VT vs. POW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 66
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 71

POW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VT vs. POW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) and VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VT	POW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.44	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.41	—	—

Drawdowns

VT vs. POW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VT drawdown since its inception was -50.27%, which is greater than POW's maximum drawdown of -17.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VT and POW.

Drawdown Indicators

	VT	POW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.27%	-17.41%	-32.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.51%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.24%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.72%	-15.32%	+14.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.99%	-4.25%	-2.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	VT	POW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.90%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.41%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.61%	32.71%	-19.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.19%	32.71%	-16.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.15%	32.71%	-15.56%

VT vs. POW - Expense Ratio Comparison

VT has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than POW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

VT vs. POW - Dividend Comparison

VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, more than POW's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF	0.13%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.58%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VT and POW in my portfolio?

VT and POW have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VT or POW?

On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VT or POW?

VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VT or POW?

VT has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.13% for POW.

What is the main difference between VT and POW?

VT is categorized as Global Equities, while POW is Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for VT and 0.75% for POW.