PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VST vs. ATZ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VST vs. ATZ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vistra Corp. (VST) and Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VST is traded in USD, while ATZ.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ATZ.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VST achieves a -8.13% return, which is significantly lower than ATZ.TO's 40.75% return.


VST

1D
1.12%
1M
5.97%
YTD
-8.13%
6M
-12.74%
1Y
-14.37%
3Y*
83.39%
5Y*
54.40%
10Y*

ATZ.TO

1D
1.41%
1M
18.58%
YTD
40.75%
6M
45.97%
1Y
151.51%
3Y*
64.97%
5Y*
34.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VST vs. ATZ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VST
Vistra Corp.
-8.13%17.66%261.52%70.73%5.08%19.57%-11.87%2.46%24.95%18.19%
ATZ.TO
Aritzia Inc.
40.75%130.10%79.16%-40.51%-14.94%103.09%38.67%21.15%19.21%-22.22%

Correlation

The correlation between VST and ATZ.TO is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2016

0.16

Fundamentals

EPS

VST:

$8.60

ATZ.TO:

CA$3.19

PE Ratio

VST:

17.20

ATZ.TO:

52.81

PEG Ratio

VST:

0.39

ATZ.TO:

1.05

PS Ratio

VST:

2.19

ATZ.TO:

5.45

Total Revenue (TTM)

VST:

$17.20B

ATZ.TO:

CA$3.70B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VST:

$1.12B

ATZ.TO:

CA$1.65B

EBITDA (TTM)

VST:

$4.34B

ATZ.TO:

CA$736.90M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VST vs. ATZ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VST
VST Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
VST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VST Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
VST Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
VST Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
VST Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

ATZ.TO
ATZ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ATZ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATZ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATZ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
ATZ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATZ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VST vs. ATZ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vistra Corp. (VST) and Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSTATZ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-4.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.55

-0.57

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

6.51

-6.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.70

18.75

-19.44

VST vs. ATZ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VST Sharpe Ratio is -0.30, which is lower than the ATZ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VST and ATZ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VST vs. ATZ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VST drawdown since its inception was -53.32%, smaller than the maximum ATZ.TO drawdown of -68.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VST and ATZ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSTATZ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.32%

-68.29%

+14.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-38.01%

-22.22%

-15.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.80%

-46.23%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.80%

-68.29%

+19.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.89%

0.00%

-31.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.72%

-21.44%

+7.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

20.73%

7.70%

+13.03%

Volatility

VST vs. ATZ.TO - Volatility Comparison

Vistra Corp. (VST) has a higher volatility of 15.14% compared to Aritzia Inc. (ATZ.TO) at 10.34%. This indicates that VST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATZ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSTATZ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.14%

10.34%

+4.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

37.96%

30.40%

+7.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

48.75%

36.88%

+11.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.97%

47.26%

+0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.22%

43.72%

-1.50%

Dividends

VST vs. ATZ.TO - Dividend Comparison

VST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while ATZ.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ATZ.TO
Aritzia Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VST
Vistra Corp.
0.61%0.56%0.63%2.13%3.12%2.64%2.75%2.17%0.00%0.00%14.97%

Financials

VST vs. ATZ.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vistra Corp. and Aritzia Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B20222023202420252026
5.64B
1.19B
(VST) Total Revenue
(ATZ.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. VST values in USD, ATZ.TO values in CAD

VST vs. ATZ.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vistra Corp. and Aritzia Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-80.0%-60.0%-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%202220232024202520260
42.8%
Portfolio components
VST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

ATZ.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported a gross profit of 507.19M and revenue of 1.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.8%.

VST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported an operating income of 1.50B and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

ATZ.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported an operating income of 183.02M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.4%.

VST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a net income of 980.00M and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.

ATZ.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aritzia Inc. reported a net income of 134.27M and revenue of 1.19B, resulting in a net margin of 11.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VST and ATZ.TO have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VST and ATZ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer