VST vs. BE
VST (Vistra Corp.) and BE (Bloom Energy Corporation) are both stocks. VST operates in Utilities - Independent Power Producers (Utilities), while BE operates in Electrical Equipment & Parts (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, VST returned 53.38%/yr vs 56.68%/yr for BE. Their 0.30 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
VST vs. BE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VST achieves a -7.89% return, which is significantly lower than BE's 136.86% return.
VST
- 1D
- -0.29%
- 1M
- -1.89%
- 6M
- -6.16%
- YTD
- -7.89%
- 1Y
- -28.40%
- 3Y*
- 76.26%
- 5Y*
- 53.38%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 29.83%
BE
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -24.02%
- 6M
- 35.96%
- YTD
- 136.86%
- 1Y
- 460.48%
- 3Y*
- 126.68%
- 5Y*
- 56.68%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 34.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.07B | $3.66B | $3.50B | |
VST Vistra Corp. | $607.28M | $633.08M | $737.36M |
VST vs. BE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VST Vistra Corp. | -7.89% | 17.66% | 261.52% | 70.73% | 5.08% | 19.57% | -11.87% | 2.46% | 1.96% |
BE Bloom Energy Corporation | 136.86% | 291.22% | 50.07% | -22.59% | -12.81% | -23.48% | 283.67% | -25.15% | -46.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between VST and BE is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018 | 0.30 |
Fundamentals
VST:
$49.97B
BE:
$60.62B
VST:
$9.68
BE:
$0.86
VST:
15.31
BE:
239.80
VST:
1.95
BE:
18.87
VST:
$17.20B
BE:
$3.11B
VST:
$1.12B
BE:
$972.69M
VST:
$4.34B
BE:
$309.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VST vs. BE — Risk / Return Rank
VST
BE
VST vs. BE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vistra Corp. (VST) and Bloom Energy Corporation (BE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VST | BE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.41 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | 8.63 | -9.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 24.90 | -26.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VST vs. BE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VST drawdown since its inception was -53.32%, smaller than the maximum BE drawdown of -92.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VST and BE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VST | BE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.32% | -92.54% | +39.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.01% | -52.65% | +14.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -48.80% | -52.65% | +3.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -48.80% | -75.87% | +27.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.71% | -40.49% | +8.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.90% | -51.49% | +37.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.95% | 18.20% | +4.75% |
Volatility
VST vs. BE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vistra Corp. (VST) is 12.98%, while Bloom Energy Corporation (BE) has a volatility of 42.49%. This indicates that VST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VST | BE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.98% | 42.49% | -29.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.02% | 84.76% | -50.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 48.95% | 114.50% | -65.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 48.14% | 88.73% | -40.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.23% | 96.71% | -54.48% |
Dividends
VST vs. BE - Dividend Comparison
VST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while BE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BE Bloom Energy Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VST Vistra Corp. | 0.61% | 0.56% | 0.63% | 2.13% | 3.12% | 2.64% | 2.75% | 2.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.97% |
Financials
VST vs. BE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vistra Corp. and Bloom Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VST vs. BE - Profitability Comparison
VST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 5.64B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
BE - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 355.57M and revenue of 1.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.4%.
VST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vistra Corp. reported an operating income of 1.50B and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.
BE - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 182.24M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.
VST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vistra Corp. reported a net income of 980.00M and revenue of 5.64B, resulting in a net margin of 17.4%.
BE - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Bloom Energy Corporation reported a net income of 196.29M and revenue of 1.07B, resulting in a net margin of 18.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VST and BE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BE has higher volatility (42.49%) compared to VST (12.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VST dropped -53.32% vs BE's -92.54%.
BE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.97 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VST and BE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer