PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSS vs. NLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSS vs. NLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSS achieves a 10.04% return, which is significantly higher than NLR's -1.81% return. Over the past 10 years, VSS has underperformed NLR with an annualized return of 8.49%, while NLR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.80% annualized return.


VSS

1D
0.50%
1M
-2.16%
YTD
10.04%
6M
12.05%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
15.73%
5Y*
5.58%
10Y*
8.49%

NLR

1D
0.84%
1M
-9.40%
YTD
-1.81%
6M
-3.70%
1Y
19.00%
3Y*
29.88%
5Y*
19.78%
10Y*
12.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSS vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
10.04%29.61%2.94%15.52%-21.48%13.05%11.81%21.36%-18.48%30.61%
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
-1.81%56.50%14.26%36.67%2.29%13.63%3.49%0.20%4.94%8.25%

Correlation

The correlation between VSS and NLR is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2009

0.64

The correlation between VSS and NLR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSS vs. NLR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSS
NLR

Industrials

19.9%
15.1%

Basic Materials

16.0%

-

Financial Services

14.2%

-

Technology

13.9%
1.6%

Energy

8.4%
45.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.3%

-

Real Estate

7.2%

-

Healthcare

4.3%

-

Utilities

3.6%
38.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%

-

Communication Services

2.0%

-

Industrials

VSS
19.9%
NLR
15.1%

Basic Materials

VSS
16.0%
NLR

-

Financial Services

VSS
14.2%
NLR

-

Technology

VSS
13.9%
NLR
1.6%

Energy

VSS
8.4%
NLR
45.3%

Consumer Cyclical

VSS
7.3%
NLR

-

Real Estate

VSS
7.2%
NLR

-

Healthcare

VSS
4.3%
NLR

-

Utilities

VSS
3.6%
NLR
38.1%

Consumer Defensive

VSS
2.7%
NLR

-

Communication Services

VSS
2.0%
NLR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSS vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSS
VSS Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSS Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
VSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSS Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

NLR
NLR Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
NLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLR Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
NLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSS vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSSNLRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.10

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

0.63

+1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.61

1.41

+6.20

VSS vs. NLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSS Sharpe Ratio is 1.51, which is higher than the NLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSS and NLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSS vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSS drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSS and NLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSSNLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.51%

-65.05%

+21.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-29.72%

+18.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.73%

-30.48%

+14.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.93%

-30.48%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.51%

-34.35%

-9.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.05%

-25.81%

+22.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.63%

-35.70%

+26.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

13.33%

-10.24%

Volatility

VSS vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) is 6.52%, while VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 13.73%. This indicates that VSS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSSNLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.52%

13.73%

-7.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.55%

33.75%

-20.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.60%

42.85%

-27.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

29.56%

-12.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.30%

24.22%

-6.92%

VSS vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSS vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison

VSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than NLR's 2.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NLR
VanEck Uranium and Nuclear ETF
2.60%2.55%0.76%4.54%2.02%1.99%2.23%2.21%3.91%4.86%3.62%3.30%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
3.08%3.39%3.44%3.14%2.30%2.74%1.90%3.25%2.80%2.83%2.93%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSS and NLR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NLR has higher volatility (13.73%) compared to VSS (6.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSS dropped -43.51% vs NLR's -65.05%.

On 10-year performance, NLR leads with 12.80% vs 8.49% for VSS. On fees, VSS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VSS has been the lower-risk option at 6.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, NLR has performed better with a 12.80% return vs 8.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for NLR.

VSS has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 2.60% for NLR.

VSS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while NLR is Alternative Energy Equities. VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while NLR tracks MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VSS and 0.56% for NLR.

VSS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSS and NLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer