PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSS vs. HSCZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSS vs. HSCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSS achieves a 7.79% return, which is significantly lower than HSCZ's 10.35% return. Over the past 10 years, VSS has underperformed HSCZ with an annualized return of 8.46%, while HSCZ has yielded a comparatively higher 12.54% annualized return.


VSS

1D
-2.68%
1M
-3.04%
YTD
7.79%
6M
7.51%
1Y
22.53%
3Y*
16.03%
5Y*
5.52%
10Y*
8.46%

HSCZ

1D
-1.36%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
10.35%
6M
10.73%
1Y
27.70%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
12.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSS vs. HSCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
7.79%29.61%2.94%15.52%-21.48%13.05%11.81%21.36%-18.48%30.61%
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
10.35%25.74%12.89%17.03%-11.46%17.75%6.40%27.89%-13.99%24.52%

Correlation

The correlation between VSS and HSCZ is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2015

0.76

The correlation between VSS and HSCZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSS vs. HSCZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSS
HSCZ

Industrials

18.7%
22.8%

Technology

14.5%
11.5%

Basic Materials

12.2%
10.3%

Financial Services

10.1%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
9.9%

Real Estate

7.1%
10.4%

Healthcare

6.0%
3.7%

Energy

4.4%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

3.5%
3.1%

Utilities

2.5%
2.2%

Communication Services

2.3%
3.1%

Industrials

VSS
18.7%
HSCZ
22.8%

Technology

VSS
14.5%
HSCZ
11.5%

Basic Materials

VSS
12.2%
HSCZ
10.3%

Financial Services

VSS
10.1%
HSCZ
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VSS
9.1%
HSCZ
9.9%

Real Estate

VSS
7.1%
HSCZ
10.4%

Healthcare

VSS
6.0%
HSCZ
3.7%

Energy

VSS
4.4%
HSCZ
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

VSS
3.5%
HSCZ
3.1%

Utilities

VSS
2.5%
HSCZ
2.2%

Communication Services

VSS
2.3%
HSCZ
3.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSS vs. HSCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSS
VSS Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
VSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSS Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
VSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

HSCZ
HSCZ Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
HSCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HSCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HSCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
HSCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
HSCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSS vs. HSCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSSHSCZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.44

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

2.90

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.24

12.32

-5.08

VSS vs. HSCZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSS Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is lower than the HSCZ Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSS and HSCZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSS vs. HSCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSS drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, which is greater than HSCZ's maximum drawdown of -34.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSS and HSCZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSSHSCZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.51%

-34.89%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-9.61%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.73%

-12.81%

-2.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.93%

-20.11%

-13.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.51%

-34.89%

-8.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.03%

-1.36%

-3.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-4.64%

-4.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

2.25%

+0.87%

Volatility

VSS vs. HSCZ - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF (HSCZ) at 3.94%. This indicates that VSS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSCZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSSHSCZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.54%

3.94%

+2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.88%

9.76%

+4.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.81%

11.64%

+4.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.63%

13.52%

+3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.17%

15.47%

+1.70%

VSS vs. HSCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than HSCZ's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSS vs. HSCZ - Dividend Comparison

VSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, more than HSCZ's 2.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HSCZ
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE Small Cap ETF
2.95%3.25%3.26%2.98%26.91%2.90%1.46%4.66%6.15%2.52%2.57%1.75%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
3.24%3.39%3.44%3.14%2.30%2.74%1.90%3.25%2.80%2.83%2.93%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSS and HSCZ have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSS has higher volatility (6.54%) compared to HSCZ (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSS dropped -43.51% vs HSCZ's -34.89%.

On 10-year performance, HSCZ leads with 12.54% vs 8.46% for VSS. On fees, VSS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, HSCZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HSCZ has performed better with a 12.54% return vs 8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for HSCZ.

VSS has the higher dividend yield at 3.24%, compared with 2.95% for HSCZ.

VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while HSCZ tracks MSCI EAFE Small-Cap 100% Hedged to USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VSS and 0.43% for HSCZ.

HSCZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSS and HSCZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer