PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSS vs. EFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSS vs. EFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSS achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly lower than EFG's 5.25% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VSS having a 7.62% annualized return and EFG not far ahead at 7.69%.


VSS

1D
-0.93%
1M
-5.21%
6M
0.59%
YTD
4.76%
1Y
14.08%
3Y*
12.89%
5Y*
5.01%
10Y*
7.62%
ALL TIME*
9.58%

EFG

1D
-0.91%
1M
-4.92%
6M
0.56%
YTD
5.25%
1Y
10.73%
3Y*
9.43%
5Y*
3.72%
10Y*
7.69%
ALL TIME*
5.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSS vs. EFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
4.76%29.61%2.94%15.52%-21.48%13.05%11.81%21.36%-18.48%30.61%
EFG
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
5.25%20.70%1.53%17.55%-23.12%11.01%17.85%27.47%-12.93%28.86%

Correlation

The correlation between VSS and EFG is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2009

0.91

The correlation between VSS and EFG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSS vs. EFG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSS
EFG

Industrials

19.5%
27.6%

Technology

14.9%
22.2%

Basic Materials

11.6%
5.6%

Financial Services

10.5%
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.1%
9.2%

Real Estate

7.0%
0.7%

Healthcare

5.9%
13.2%

Energy

4.0%
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
3.8%

Utilities

2.3%
1.4%

Communication Services

2.1%
4.8%

Industrials

VSS
19.5%
EFG
27.6%

Technology

VSS
14.9%
EFG
22.2%

Basic Materials

VSS
11.6%
EFG
5.6%

Financial Services

VSS
10.5%
EFG
11.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VSS
9.1%
EFG
9.2%

Real Estate

VSS
7.0%
EFG
0.7%

Healthcare

VSS
5.9%
EFG
13.2%

Energy

VSS
4.0%
EFG
0.5%

Consumer Defensive

VSS
3.6%
EFG
3.8%

Utilities

VSS
2.3%
EFG
1.4%

Communication Services

VSS
2.1%
EFG
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSS vs. EFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSS
VSS Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
VSS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSS Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
VSS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSS Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

EFG
EFG Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
EFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFG Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
EFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSS vs. EFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) and iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VSSEFGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.11

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

0.84

+0.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.12

3.04

+1.08

VSS vs. EFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSS Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is higher than the EFG Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSS and EFG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VSS vs. EFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSS drawdown since its inception was -43.51%, smaller than the maximum EFG drawdown of -58.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSS and EFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSSEFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.51%

-58.40%

+14.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.62%

-12.78%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.73%

-16.87%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.93%

-35.78%

+1.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.51%

-35.78%

-7.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.70%

-5.15%

-2.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.60%

-12.09%

+2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

3.54%

-0.11%

Volatility

VSS vs. EFG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF (VSS) is 4.76%, while iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF (EFG) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that VSS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSSEFGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.76%

5.69%

-0.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.24%

16.06%

-1.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.08%

18.52%

-2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.65%

18.39%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.12%

17.59%

-0.47%

VSS vs. EFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSS has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than EFG's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSS vs. EFG - Dividend Comparison

VSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than EFG's 2.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFG
iShares MSCI EAFE Growth ETF
2.34%2.53%1.64%1.63%1.27%1.54%0.85%1.69%1.98%1.56%2.20%1.75%
VSS
Vanguard FTSE All-World ex-US Small-Cap ETF
3.33%3.39%3.44%3.14%2.30%2.74%1.90%3.25%2.80%2.83%2.93%2.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSS and EFG have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFG has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to VSS (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSS dropped -43.51% vs EFG's -58.40%.

On 10-year performance, EFG leads with 7.69% vs 7.62% for VSS. On fees, VSS is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VSS has been the lower-risk option at 4.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EFG has performed better with a 7.69% return vs 7.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSS is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for EFG.

VSS has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 2.34% for EFG.

VSS is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while EFG is Foreign Large Cap Equities. VSS tracks FTSE Global Small Cap ex US Index, while EFG tracks MSCI EAFE Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for VSS and 0.34% for EFG.

VSS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.88 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSS and EFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer