VSMV vs. MKAM
Compare and contrast key facts about VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and MKAM ETF (MKAM).
VSMV and MKAM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. VSMV is a passively managed fund by Crestview that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index. It was launched on Jun 22, 2017. MKAM is an actively managed fund by MKAM. It was launched on Apr 11, 2023.
Performance
VSMV vs. MKAM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VSMV vs. MKAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 2.63% | 16.77% | 15.79% | 9.04% |
MKAM MKAM ETF | -1.48% | 8.07% | 12.15% | 8.23% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSMV achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly higher than MKAM's -1.48% return.
VSMV
- 1D
- 1.41%
- 1M
- -3.84%
- YTD
- 2.63%
- 6M
- 6.16%
- 1Y
- 18.57%
- 3Y*
- 15.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.14%
- 10Y*
- —
MKAM
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -1.85%
- YTD
- -1.48%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- 7.42%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VSMV vs. MKAM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSMV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MKAM's 0.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VSMV vs. MKAM — Risk / Return Rank
VSMV
MKAM
VSMV vs. MKAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and MKAM ETF (MKAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VSMV | MKAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 1.23 | +0.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.01 | 1.71 | +0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.24 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 2.02 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.28 | 7.08 | +3.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VSMV | MKAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 1.23 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 1.45 | -0.66 |
Correlation
The correlation between VSMV and MKAM is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
VSMV vs. MKAM - Dividend Comparison
VSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than MKAM's 3.10% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.40% | 1.35% | 1.36% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 1.36% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.42% | 1.11% |
MKAM MKAM ETF | 3.10% | 2.56% | 1.88% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
VSMV vs. MKAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSMV drawdown since its inception was -31.33%, which is greater than MKAM's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSMV and MKAM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSMV | MKAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.33% | -5.01% | -26.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.43% | -3.72% | -6.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.84% | -2.82% | -1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.46% | -1.17% | -2.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 1.06% | +0.87% |
Volatility
VSMV vs. MKAM - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to MKAM ETF (MKAM) at 1.96%. This indicates that VSMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VSMV | MKAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.80% | 1.96% | +0.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.75% | 5.05% | +1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.44% | 6.06% | +7.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.92% | 6.28% | +6.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.14% | 6.28% | +8.86% |