PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSMV vs. MKAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VSMV vs. MKAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and MKAM ETF (MKAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VSMV vs. MKAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
2.63%16.77%15.79%9.04%
MKAM
MKAM ETF
-1.48%8.07%12.15%8.23%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSMV achieves a 2.63% return, which is significantly higher than MKAM's -1.48% return.


VSMV

1D
1.41%
1M
-3.84%
YTD
2.63%
6M
6.16%
1Y
18.57%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
11.14%
10Y*

MKAM

1D
0.94%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
-1.48%
6M
0.34%
1Y
7.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VSMV vs. MKAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSMV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MKAM's 0.96% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VSMV vs. MKAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSMV
VSMV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

MKAM
MKAM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MKAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKAM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
MKAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKAM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSMV vs. MKAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and MKAM ETF (MKAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSMVMKAMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

1.23

+0.16

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.01

1.71

+0.30

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

2.02

-0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.28

7.08

+3.20

VSMV vs. MKAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSMV Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is comparable to the MKAM Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSMV and MKAM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSMVMKAMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

1.23

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

1.45

-0.66

Correlation

The correlation between VSMV and MKAM is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

VSMV vs. MKAM - Dividend Comparison

VSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than MKAM's 3.10% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
1.40%1.35%1.36%1.77%1.99%1.36%2.01%2.00%2.42%1.11%
MKAM
MKAM ETF
3.10%2.56%1.88%1.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VSMV vs. MKAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSMV drawdown since its inception was -31.33%, which is greater than MKAM's maximum drawdown of -5.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSMV and MKAM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VSMVMKAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.33%

-5.01%

-26.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.43%

-3.72%

-6.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.84%

-2.82%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-1.17%

-2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.06%

+0.87%

Volatility

VSMV vs. MKAM - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) has a higher volatility of 2.80% compared to MKAM ETF (MKAM) at 1.96%. This indicates that VSMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MKAM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VSMVMKAMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

1.96%

+0.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.75%

5.05%

+1.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.44%

6.06%

+7.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.92%

6.28%

+6.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.14%

6.28%

+8.86%