PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MKAM vs. PZRMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

MKAM vs. PZRMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MKAM ETF (MKAM) and PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PZRMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

MKAM vs. PZRMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
MKAM
MKAM ETF
-1.48%8.07%12.15%8.23%
PZRMX
PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund
2.77%16.18%12.47%3.29%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MKAM achieves a -1.48% return, which is significantly lower than PZRMX's 2.77% return.


MKAM

1D
0.94%
1M
-1.85%
YTD
-1.48%
6M
0.34%
1Y
7.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PZRMX

1D
0.65%
1M
-2.62%
YTD
2.77%
6M
5.17%
1Y
12.48%
3Y*
12.02%
5Y*
8.51%
10Y*
7.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


MKAM vs. PZRMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MKAM has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than PZRMX's 1.18% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

MKAM vs. PZRMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MKAM
MKAM Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
MKAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKAM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
MKAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKAM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

PZRMX
PZRMX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PZRMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PZRMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
PZRMX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PZRMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PZRMX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MKAM vs. PZRMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MKAM ETF (MKAM) and PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PZRMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


MKAMPZRMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.23

1.95

-0.72

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.71

2.60

-0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.37

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

2.78

-0.77

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.08

12.67

-5.60

MKAM vs. PZRMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MKAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the PZRMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MKAM and PZRMX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


MKAMPZRMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.23

1.95

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.45

0.65

+0.79

Correlation

The correlation between MKAM and PZRMX is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

MKAM vs. PZRMX - Dividend Comparison

MKAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than PZRMX's 2.29% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MKAM
MKAM ETF
3.10%2.56%1.88%1.70%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PZRMX
PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund
2.29%2.35%9.84%0.00%13.86%11.20%0.54%2.56%11.15%6.06%0.16%2.73%

Drawdowns

MKAM vs. PZRMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MKAM drawdown since its inception was -5.01%, smaller than the maximum PZRMX drawdown of -19.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKAM and PZRMX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


MKAMPZRMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-19.71%

+14.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.72%

-4.96%

+1.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.82%

-2.72%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.17%

-4.64%

+3.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.06%

1.09%

-0.03%

Volatility

MKAM vs. PZRMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MKAM ETF (MKAM) is 1.96%, while PIMCO Inflation Response Multi-Asset Fund (PZRMX) has a volatility of 2.33%. This indicates that MKAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PZRMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


MKAMPZRMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.96%

2.33%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.05%

4.73%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.06%

6.81%

-0.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.28%

8.38%

-2.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.28%

7.56%

-1.28%