PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MKAM vs. TSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MKAM vs. TSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MKAM ETF (MKAM) and Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF (TSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MKAM achieves a 3.90% return, which is significantly lower than TSPX's 6.22% return.


MKAM

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.58%
YTD
3.90%
6M
3.53%
1Y
12.35%
3Y*
9.64%
5Y*
10Y*

TSPX

1D
-0.99%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
6.22%
6M
5.87%
1Y
18.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MKAM vs. TSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
MKAM
MKAM ETF
3.90%5.64%
TSPX
Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF
6.22%15.46%

Correlation

The correlation between MKAM and TSPX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 21, 2025

0.88

The correlation between MKAM and TSPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MKAM vs. TSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MKAM
MKAM Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
MKAM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MKAM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MKAM Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
MKAM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
MKAM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

TSPX
TSPX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
TSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
TSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MKAM vs. TSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MKAM ETF (MKAM) and Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF (TSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MKAMTSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.35

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

2.68

+0.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.19

12.02

+0.17

MKAM vs. TSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MKAM Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the TSPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MKAM and TSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MKAM vs. TSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MKAM drawdown since its inception was -5.01%, smaller than the maximum TSPX drawdown of -7.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MKAM and TSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MKAMTSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-7.80%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.72%

-6.81%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.52%

-2.35%

+0.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.13%

-1.20%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

1.52%

-0.50%

Volatility

MKAM vs. TSPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MKAM ETF (MKAM) is 2.40%, while Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF (TSPX) has a volatility of 3.61%. This indicates that MKAM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MKAMTSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.40%

3.61%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.94%

7.72%

-2.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.41%

9.61%

-3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.31%

10.98%

-4.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.31%

10.98%

-4.67%

MKAM vs. TSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MKAM has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than TSPX's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

MKAM vs. TSPX - Dividend Comparison

MKAM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.94%, more than TSPX's 2.02% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MKAM
MKAM ETF
2.94%2.56%1.88%1.70%
TSPX
Twin Oak Active Opportunities ETF
2.02%2.15%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, MKAM and TSPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TSPX has higher volatility (3.61%) compared to MKAM (2.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MKAM dropped -5.01% vs TSPX's -7.80%.

On 1-year performance, TSPX leads with 18.17% vs 12.35% for MKAM. On fees, MKAM is cheaper at 0.96% per year. On volatility, MKAM has been the lower-risk option at 2.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TSPX has performed better with a 18.17% return vs 12.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MKAM is cheaper with a 0.96% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TSPX.

MKAM has the higher dividend yield at 2.94%, compared with 2.02% for TSPX.

They also come from different issuers: MKAM and Twin Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.96% for MKAM and 1.01% for TSPX.

MKAM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MKAM and TSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer