VSMV vs. IDLV
VSMV (VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF) and IDLV (Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds - VSMV tracks the Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index while IDLV tracks the S&P BMI International Developed Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VSMV returned 10.98%/yr vs 6.21%/yr for IDLV. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VSMV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IDLV.
Performance
VSMV vs. IDLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSMV achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly higher than IDLV's 3.81% return.
VSMV
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -2.57%
- YTD
- 7.21%
- 6M
- 6.29%
- 1Y
- 22.88%
- 3Y*
- 15.69%
- 5Y*
- 10.98%
- 10Y*
- —
IDLV
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 3.81%
- 6M
- 3.41%
- 1Y
- 10.73%
- 3Y*
- 12.60%
- 5Y*
- 6.21%
- 10Y*
- 6.02%
VSMV vs. IDLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 7.21% | 16.77% | 15.79% | 12.34% | -7.56% | 25.66% | 5.05% | 26.79% | -1.12% | 11.48% |
IDLV Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF | 3.81% | 27.77% | 2.15% | 9.18% | -12.21% | 9.76% | -9.78% | 20.09% | -8.02% | 7.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSMV and IDLV is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2017 | 0.62 |
The correlation between VSMV and IDLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.
VSMV vs. IDLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VSMV
IDLV
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
VSMV
IDLV
Consumer Defensive
VSMV
IDLV
Healthcare
VSMV
IDLV
Industrials
VSMV
IDLV
Financial Services
VSMV
IDLV
Communication Services
VSMV
IDLV
Consumer Cyclical
VSMV
IDLV
Energy
VSMV
IDLV
Basic Materials
VSMV
IDLV
Real Estate
VSMV
IDLV
Utilities
VSMV
IDLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSMV vs. IDLV — Risk / Return Rank
VSMV
IDLV
VSMV vs. IDLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) and Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VSMV | IDLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.20 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.43 | 1.43 | +3.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.14 | 3.82 | +12.32 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VSMV vs. IDLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSMV drawdown since its inception was -31.33%, smaller than the maximum IDLV drawdown of -34.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSMV and IDLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSMV | IDLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.33% | -34.65% | +3.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.18% | -7.54% | +2.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.22% | -9.97% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.96% | -22.52% | +4.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.92% | -4.60% | +1.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.40% | -5.94% | +2.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.42% | 2.81% | -1.39% |
Volatility
VSMV vs. IDLV - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) has a higher volatility of 3.00% compared to Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) at 2.69%. This indicates that VSMV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSMV | IDLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.00% | 2.69% | +0.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.70% | 7.86% | -1.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.28% | 9.81% | -0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.87% | 11.78% | +1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.02% | 13.22% | +1.80% |
VSMV vs. IDLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VSMV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than IDLV's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
VSMV vs. IDLV - Dividend Comparison
VSMV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%, less than IDLV's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDLV Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF | 5.05% | 4.63% | 3.41% | 3.59% | 4.69% | 2.99% | 2.30% | 4.92% | 3.94% | 3.05% | 3.92% | 3.93% |
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.38% | 1.35% | 1.36% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 1.36% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.42% | 1.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VSMV and IDLV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VSMV has higher volatility (3.00%) compared to IDLV (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSMV dropped -31.33% vs IDLV's -34.65%.
On 5-year performance, VSMV leads with 10.98% vs 6.21% for IDLV. On fees, IDLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IDLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VSMV has performed better with a 10.98% return vs 6.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VSMV.
IDLV has the higher dividend yield at 5.05%, compared with 1.38% for VSMV.
VSMV tracks Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index, while IDLV tracks S&P BMI International Developed Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VSMV and 0.25% for IDLV.
VSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VSMV and IDLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer