PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSEQX vs. VO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSEQX vs. VO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Strategic Equity Fund (VSEQX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSEQX achieves a 16.05% return, which is significantly higher than VO's 10.05% return. Over the past 10 years, VSEQX has outperformed VO with an annualized return of 13.13%, while VO has yielded a comparatively lower 11.55% annualized return.


VSEQX

1D
0.65%
1M
3.35%
YTD
16.05%
6M
16.43%
1Y
35.10%
3Y*
21.36%
5Y*
11.97%
10Y*
13.13%

VO

1D
-0.45%
1M
3.20%
YTD
10.05%
6M
9.73%
1Y
18.13%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
11.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSEQX vs. VO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSEQX
Vanguard Strategic Equity Fund
16.05%15.32%16.67%19.31%-11.90%30.83%10.26%26.76%-11.86%12.36%
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
10.05%11.62%15.31%16.03%-18.73%24.70%18.10%30.98%-9.24%19.28%

Correlation

The correlation between VSEQX and VO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2004

0.96

The correlation between VSEQX and VO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSEQX vs. VO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSEQX
VO

Technology

17.5%
18.6%

Industrials

16.6%
17.9%

Financial Services

15.2%
12.8%

Healthcare

11.0%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.3%
8.6%

Real Estate

6.7%
5.4%

Energy

5.5%
8.5%

Basic Materials

4.9%
4.2%

Utilities

4.9%
8.3%

Communication Services

3.8%
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
4.8%

Technology

VSEQX
17.5%
VO
18.6%

Industrials

VSEQX
16.6%
VO
17.9%

Financial Services

VSEQX
15.2%
VO
12.8%

Healthcare

VSEQX
11.0%
VO
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

VSEQX
10.3%
VO
8.6%

Real Estate

VSEQX
6.7%
VO
5.4%

Energy

VSEQX
5.5%
VO
8.5%

Basic Materials

VSEQX
4.9%
VO
4.2%

Utilities

VSEQX
4.9%
VO
8.3%

Communication Services

VSEQX
3.8%
VO
3.1%

Consumer Defensive

VSEQX
3.6%
VO
4.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSEQX vs. VO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSEQX
VSEQX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VSEQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSEQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSEQX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
VSEQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSEQX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

VO
VO Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
VO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
VO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
VO Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSEQX vs. VO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Strategic Equity Fund (VSEQX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSEQXVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.26

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.83

2.23

+2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.60

8.50

+10.10

VSEQX vs. VO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSEQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is higher than the VO Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSEQX and VO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSEQXVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.44

1.48

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.45

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.61

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.50

0.00

Drawdowns

VSEQX vs. VO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSEQX drawdown since its inception was -63.55%, which is greater than VO's maximum drawdown of -58.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSEQX and VO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSEQXVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.55%

-58.87%

-4.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.60%

-8.17%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.73%

-19.02%

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.73%

-27.57%

+2.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.08%

-39.37%

-4.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.45%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.06%

-7.86%

-1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

2.14%

-0.17%

Volatility

VSEQX vs. VO - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Strategic Equity Fund (VSEQX) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF (VO) at 2.99%. This indicates that VSEQX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSEQXVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

2.99%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.61%

9.21%

+1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.03%

12.34%

+2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.95%

17.59%

+2.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.42%

18.95%

+2.47%

VSEQX vs. VO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSEQX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than VO's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VSEQX vs. VO - Dividend Comparison

VSEQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.61%, more than VO's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VO
Vanguard Mid-Cap ETF
1.36%1.52%1.49%1.52%1.60%1.12%1.45%1.48%1.82%1.35%1.45%1.47%
VSEQX
Vanguard Strategic Equity Fund
9.61%11.16%11.36%6.11%11.77%21.36%1.77%2.92%10.34%7.05%3.13%12.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, VSEQX and VO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VSEQX has higher volatility (3.64%) compared to VO (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSEQX dropped -63.55% vs VO's -58.87%.

VSEQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSEQX and VO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer