PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSDA vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSDA vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSDA achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly lower than VTI's 12.01% return.


VSDA

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.19%
YTD
4.67%
6M
5.10%
1Y
10.75%
3Y*
9.79%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*

VTI

1D
0.26%
1M
5.37%
YTD
12.01%
6M
12.40%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
15.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSDA vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSDA
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
4.67%6.67%9.40%8.74%-4.42%21.95%12.72%31.39%-1.40%14.27%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
12.01%17.10%23.81%26.05%-19.52%25.68%21.08%30.67%-5.23%15.64%

Correlation

The correlation between VSDA and VTI is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2017

0.70

The correlation between VSDA and VTI shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.73 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VSDA vs. VTI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSDA
VTI

Consumer Defensive

31.5%
4.7%

Financial Services

21.0%
12.0%

Industrials

16.8%
9.8%

Basic Materials

8.0%
2.0%

Healthcare

7.6%
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
10.0%

Technology

4.7%
33.5%

Utilities

2.7%
2.3%

Energy

2.5%
3.7%

Communication Services

0.1%
10.3%

Real Estate

0.0%
2.4%

Consumer Defensive

VSDA
31.5%
VTI
4.7%

Financial Services

VSDA
21.0%
VTI
12.0%

Industrials

VSDA
16.8%
VTI
9.8%

Basic Materials

VSDA
8.0%
VTI
2.0%

Healthcare

VSDA
7.6%
VTI
9.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VSDA
5.1%
VTI
10.0%

Technology

VSDA
4.7%
VTI
33.5%

Utilities

VSDA
2.7%
VTI
2.3%

Energy

VSDA
2.5%
VTI
3.7%

Communication Services

VSDA
0.1%
VTI
10.3%

Real Estate

VSDA
0.0%
VTI
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSDA vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSDA
VSDA Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
VSDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSDA Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VSDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSDA Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSDA vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSDAVTIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

2.48

-1.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.48

3.37

-1.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.45

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

3.44

-2.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.88

15.88

-13.00

VSDA vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSDA and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSDAVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

2.48

-1.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.75

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.51

+0.15

Drawdowns

VSDA vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSDA drawdown since its inception was -32.12%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSDA and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSDAVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.12%

-55.45%

+23.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-8.92%

-0.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-19.30%

+3.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.14%

-25.36%

+9.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.32%

0.00%

-6.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-8.03%

+4.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.64%

1.93%

+1.71%

Volatility

VSDA vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.86%. This indicates that VSDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSDAVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

2.86%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.13%

9.11%

-0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.24%

12.15%

-0.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.03%

17.40%

-3.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.60%

18.30%

-1.70%

VSDA vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSDA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSDA vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

VSDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VSDA
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
2.61%2.65%2.36%1.92%1.83%1.40%1.49%1.36%1.69%1.23%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSDA and VTI have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSDA has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to VTI (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSDA dropped -32.12% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 5-year performance, VTI leads with 13.05% vs 6.75% for VSDA. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VTI has performed better with a 13.05% return vs 6.75%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VSDA.

VSDA has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.

VSDA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. VSDA tracks Nasdaq Victory Dividend Accelerator Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VSDA and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSDA and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer