VSDA vs. VSMV
VSDA (VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF) and VSMV (VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VSDA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Dividend Accelerator Index, while VSMV is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VSDA returned 6.69%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for VSMV. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
VSDA vs. VSMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VSDA achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly lower than VSMV's 9.29% return.
VSDA
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 4.72%
- 6M
- 4.63%
- 1Y
- 10.40%
- 3Y*
- 9.81%
- 5Y*
- 6.69%
- 10Y*
- —
VSMV
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 2.75%
- YTD
- 9.29%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- 24.46%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 11.35%
- 10Y*
- —
VSDA vs. VSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSDA VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF | 4.72% | 6.67% | 9.40% | 8.74% | -4.42% | 21.95% | 12.72% | 31.39% | -1.40% | 10.08% |
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 9.29% | 16.77% | 15.79% | 12.34% | -7.56% | 25.66% | 5.05% | 26.79% | -1.12% | 11.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between VSDA and VSMV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017 | 0.77 |
The correlation between VSDA and VSMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
VSDA vs. VSMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VSDA
VSMV
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Utilities
Energy
Communication Services
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
VSDA
VSMV
Financial Services
VSDA
VSMV
Industrials
VSDA
VSMV
Basic Materials
VSDA
VSMV
Healthcare
VSDA
VSMV
Consumer Cyclical
VSDA
VSMV
Technology
VSDA
VSMV
Utilities
VSDA
VSMV
Energy
VSDA
VSMV
Communication Services
VSDA
VSMV
Real Estate
VSDA
VSMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VSDA vs. VSMV — Risk / Return Rank
VSDA
VSMV
VSDA vs. VSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VSDA | VSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.49 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 4.74 | -3.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.84 | 18.09 | -15.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VSDA | VSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 2.71 | -1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.89 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.82 | -0.16 |
Drawdowns
VSDA vs. VSMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VSDA drawdown since its inception was -32.12%, roughly equal to the maximum VSMV drawdown of -31.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSDA and VSMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VSDA | VSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.12% | -31.33% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -5.18% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.54% | -13.22% | -2.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.14% | -17.96% | +1.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.28% | -0.79% | -5.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.64% | -3.41% | -0.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 1.36% | +2.31% |
Volatility
VSDA vs. VSMV - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) at 2.41%. This indicates that VSDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VSDA | VSMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.84% | 2.41% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.12% | 6.34% | +1.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.23% | 9.08% | +2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.03% | 12.86% | +1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 15.04% | +1.55% |
VSDA vs. VSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VSDA and VSMV have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
VSDA vs. VSMV - Dividend Comparison
VSDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than VSMV's 1.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VSDA VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF | 2.61% | 2.65% | 2.36% | 1.92% | 1.83% | 1.40% | 1.49% | 1.36% | 1.69% | 1.23% |
VSMV VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.31% | 1.35% | 1.36% | 1.77% | 1.99% | 1.36% | 2.01% | 2.00% | 2.42% | 1.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VSDA and VSMV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VSDA has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to VSMV (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSDA dropped -32.12% vs VSMV's -31.33%.
On 5-year performance, VSMV leads with 11.35% vs 6.69% for VSDA. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, VSMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VSMV has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 6.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VSDA and VSMV have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
VSDA has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.31% for VSMV.
VSDA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VSMV is Volatility Hedged Equity. VSDA tracks Nasdaq Victory Dividend Accelerator Index, while VSMV tracks Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index.
VSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VSDA and VSMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer