PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSDA vs. VSMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSDA vs. VSMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSDA achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly lower than VSMV's 9.29% return.


VSDA

1D
0.04%
1M
0.21%
YTD
4.72%
6M
4.63%
1Y
10.40%
3Y*
9.81%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*

VSMV

1D
0.33%
1M
2.75%
YTD
9.29%
6M
9.79%
1Y
24.46%
3Y*
16.84%
5Y*
11.35%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSDA vs. VSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSDA
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
4.72%6.67%9.40%8.74%-4.42%21.95%12.72%31.39%-1.40%10.08%
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
9.29%16.77%15.79%12.34%-7.56%25.66%5.05%26.79%-1.12%11.48%

Correlation

The correlation between VSDA and VSMV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017

0.77

The correlation between VSDA and VSMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VSDA vs. VSMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSDA
VSMV

Consumer Defensive

31.5%
17.6%

Financial Services

21.0%
8.1%

Industrials

16.8%
8.5%

Basic Materials

8.0%
1.8%

Healthcare

7.6%
14.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
5.0%

Technology

4.7%
34.4%

Utilities

2.7%
0.0%

Energy

2.5%
4.4%

Communication Services

0.1%
5.4%

Real Estate

0.0%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

VSDA
31.5%
VSMV
17.6%

Financial Services

VSDA
21.0%
VSMV
8.1%

Industrials

VSDA
16.8%
VSMV
8.5%

Basic Materials

VSDA
8.0%
VSMV
1.8%

Healthcare

VSDA
7.6%
VSMV
14.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VSDA
5.1%
VSMV
5.0%

Technology

VSDA
4.7%
VSMV
34.4%

Utilities

VSDA
2.7%
VSMV
0.0%

Energy

VSDA
2.5%
VSMV
4.4%

Communication Services

VSDA
0.1%
VSMV
5.4%

Real Estate

VSDA
0.0%
VSMV
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSDA vs. VSMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSDA
VSDA Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VSDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSDA Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VSDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSDA Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMV
VSMV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
VSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSDA vs. VSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSDAVSMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.49

-0.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

4.74

-3.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.84

18.09

-15.24

VSDA vs. VSMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the VSMV Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSDA and VSMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSDAVSMVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

2.71

-1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.89

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.82

-0.16

Drawdowns

VSDA vs. VSMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSDA drawdown since its inception was -32.12%, roughly equal to the maximum VSMV drawdown of -31.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSDA and VSMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSDAVSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.12%

-31.33%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-5.18%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-13.22%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.14%

-17.96%

+1.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.28%

-0.79%

-5.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-3.41%

-0.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

1.36%

+2.31%

Volatility

VSDA vs. VSMV - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) at 2.41%. This indicates that VSDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSDAVSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

2.41%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

6.34%

+1.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.23%

9.08%

+2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.03%

12.86%

+1.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

15.04%

+1.55%

VSDA vs. VSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VSDA and VSMV have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

VSDA vs. VSMV - Dividend Comparison

VSDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than VSMV's 1.31% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSDA
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
2.61%2.65%2.36%1.92%1.83%1.40%1.49%1.36%1.69%1.23%
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
1.31%1.35%1.36%1.77%1.99%1.36%2.01%2.00%2.42%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSDA and VSMV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSDA has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to VSMV (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSDA dropped -32.12% vs VSMV's -31.33%.

On 5-year performance, VSMV leads with 11.35% vs 6.69% for VSDA. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, VSMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VSMV has performed better with a 11.35% return vs 6.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSDA and VSMV have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

VSDA has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.31% for VSMV.

VSDA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VSMV is Volatility Hedged Equity. VSDA tracks Nasdaq Victory Dividend Accelerator Index, while VSMV tracks Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index.

VSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSDA and VSMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer