PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSDA vs. MFUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSDA vs. MFUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSDA achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly lower than MFUS's 16.37% return.


VSDA

1D
0.04%
1M
0.21%
YTD
4.72%
6M
4.63%
1Y
10.40%
3Y*
9.81%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*

MFUS

1D
0.03%
1M
5.72%
YTD
16.37%
6M
16.58%
1Y
28.04%
3Y*
22.25%
5Y*
12.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSDA vs. MFUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSDA
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
4.72%6.67%9.40%8.74%-4.42%21.95%12.72%31.39%-1.40%11.58%
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
16.37%16.02%20.17%12.19%-5.82%24.10%10.64%26.17%-7.30%11.20%

Correlation

The correlation between VSDA and MFUS is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2017

0.79

The correlation between VSDA and MFUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSDA vs. MFUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSDA
MFUS

Consumer Defensive

31.5%
10.3%

Financial Services

21.0%
12.6%

Industrials

16.8%
12.6%

Basic Materials

8.0%
2.8%

Healthcare

7.6%
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
10.6%

Technology

4.7%
21.8%

Utilities

2.7%
1.7%

Energy

2.5%
7.0%

Communication Services

0.1%
5.3%

Real Estate

0.0%
1.8%

Consumer Defensive

VSDA
31.5%
MFUS
10.3%

Financial Services

VSDA
21.0%
MFUS
12.6%

Industrials

VSDA
16.8%
MFUS
12.6%

Basic Materials

VSDA
8.0%
MFUS
2.8%

Healthcare

VSDA
7.6%
MFUS
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

VSDA
5.1%
MFUS
10.6%

Technology

VSDA
4.7%
MFUS
21.8%

Utilities

VSDA
2.7%
MFUS
1.7%

Energy

VSDA
2.5%
MFUS
7.0%

Communication Services

VSDA
0.1%
MFUS
5.3%

Real Estate

VSDA
0.0%
MFUS
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSDA vs. MFUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSDA
VSDA Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VSDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSDA Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VSDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSDA Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

MFUS
MFUS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
MFUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFUS Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
MFUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSDA vs. MFUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSDAMFUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.47

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

4.41

-3.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.84

18.13

-15.28

VSDA vs. MFUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the MFUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSDA and MFUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSDAMFUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

2.63

-1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.86

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.79

-0.13

Drawdowns

VSDA vs. MFUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSDA drawdown since its inception was -32.12%, smaller than the maximum MFUS drawdown of -35.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSDA and MFUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSDAMFUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.12%

-35.21%

+3.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-6.39%

-3.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-15.39%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.14%

-18.22%

+2.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.28%

0.00%

-6.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-4.00%

+0.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

1.55%

+2.12%

Volatility

VSDA vs. MFUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) is 2.84%, while PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF (MFUS) has a volatility of 3.19%. This indicates that VSDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MFUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSDAMFUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

3.19%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

8.22%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.23%

10.72%

+0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.03%

15.03%

-1.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

17.35%

-0.76%

VSDA vs. MFUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSDA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than MFUS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

VSDA vs. MFUS - Dividend Comparison

VSDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than MFUS's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MFUS
PIMCO RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Equity ETF
1.36%1.54%1.45%1.96%2.07%1.35%1.72%1.89%1.69%1.01%
VSDA
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
2.61%2.65%2.36%1.92%1.83%1.40%1.49%1.36%1.69%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSDA and MFUS have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MFUS has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to VSDA (2.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSDA dropped -32.12% vs MFUS's -35.21%.

On 5-year performance, MFUS leads with 12.82% vs 6.69% for VSDA. On fees, MFUS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, VSDA has been the lower-risk option at 2.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MFUS has performed better with a 12.82% return vs 6.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MFUS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for VSDA.

VSDA has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.36% for MFUS.

VSDA tracks Nasdaq Victory Dividend Accelerator Index, while MFUS tracks RAFI Dynamic Multi-Factor U.S. Index​. They also come from different issuers: Crestview and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for VSDA and 0.30% for MFUS.

MFUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSDA and MFUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer