PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSDA vs. IQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

VSDA vs. IQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

VSDA vs. IQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
VSDA
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
3.70%6.67%9.40%8.74%-4.42%21.95%21.52%
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
1.18%30.76%31.03%41.06%-33.36%25.18%78.48%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSDA achieves a 3.70% return, which is significantly higher than IQM's 1.18% return.


VSDA

1D
0.98%
1M
-6.88%
YTD
3.70%
6M
3.36%
1Y
8.38%
3Y*
8.99%
5Y*
7.80%
10Y*

IQM

1D
6.12%
1M
-5.61%
YTD
1.18%
6M
1.33%
1Y
55.72%
3Y*
26.13%
5Y*
14.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


VSDA vs. IQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VSDA has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IQM's 0.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

VSDA vs. IQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSDA
VSDA Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
VSDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSDA Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
VSDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSDA Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

IQM
IQM Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
IQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSDA vs. IQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSDAIQMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.57

1.68

-1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.92

2.29

-1.36

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.32

-0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

3.72

-2.82

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.89

11.65

-8.76

VSDA vs. IQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the IQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSDA and IQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSDAIQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

1.68

-1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.52

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.77

-0.11

Correlation

The correlation between VSDA and IQM is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

VSDA vs. IQM - Dividend Comparison

VSDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, while IQM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSDA
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
2.64%2.65%2.36%1.92%1.83%1.40%1.49%1.36%1.69%1.23%
IQM
Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%0.01%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

VSDA vs. IQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSDA drawdown since its inception was -32.12%, smaller than the maximum IQM drawdown of -44.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSDA and IQM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


VSDAIQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.12%

-44.91%

+12.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.75%

-14.71%

+3.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.14%

-44.91%

+28.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.18%

-8.68%

+1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-12.55%

+8.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

4.70%

-1.34%

Volatility

VSDA vs. IQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) is 3.53%, while Franklin Intelligent Machines ETF (IQM) has a volatility of 12.90%. This indicates that VSDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


VSDAIQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

12.90%

-9.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

23.48%

-15.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.76%

33.37%

-18.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.99%

28.67%

-14.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.67%

30.73%

-14.06%