PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VSDA vs. CDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VSDA vs. CDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VSDA achieves a 4.72% return, which is significantly lower than CDL's 10.43% return.


VSDA

1D
0.04%
1M
0.21%
YTD
4.72%
6M
4.63%
1Y
10.40%
3Y*
9.81%
5Y*
6.69%
10Y*

CDL

1D
-0.61%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
10.43%
6M
10.31%
1Y
18.04%
3Y*
14.68%
5Y*
8.68%
10Y*
10.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VSDA vs. CDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VSDA
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
4.72%6.67%9.40%8.74%-4.42%21.95%12.72%31.39%-1.40%14.27%
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
10.43%9.04%15.58%3.03%-0.45%33.42%-3.35%26.38%-5.86%11.66%

Correlation

The correlation between VSDA and CDL is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2017

0.80

The correlation between VSDA and CDL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

VSDA vs. CDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VSDA
CDL

Consumer Defensive

31.5%
15.9%

Financial Services

21.0%
23.4%

Industrials

16.8%
2.3%

Basic Materials

8.0%
0.0%

Healthcare

7.6%
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

5.1%
6.6%

Technology

4.7%
6.9%

Utilities

2.7%
24.3%

Energy

2.5%
9.5%

Communication Services

0.1%
4.4%

Real Estate

0.0%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

VSDA
31.5%
CDL
15.9%

Financial Services

VSDA
21.0%
CDL
23.4%

Industrials

VSDA
16.8%
CDL
2.3%

Basic Materials

VSDA
8.0%
CDL
0.0%

Healthcare

VSDA
7.6%
CDL
6.8%

Consumer Cyclical

VSDA
5.1%
CDL
6.6%

Technology

VSDA
4.7%
CDL
6.9%

Utilities

VSDA
2.7%
CDL
24.3%

Energy

VSDA
2.5%
CDL
9.5%

Communication Services

VSDA
0.1%
CDL
4.4%

Real Estate

VSDA
0.0%
CDL
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VSDA vs. CDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VSDA
VSDA Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
VSDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSDA Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
VSDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSDA Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

CDL
CDL Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
CDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
CDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
CDL Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VSDA vs. CDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) and VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VSDACDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.32

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

3.20

-2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.84

11.35

-8.51

VSDA vs. CDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VSDA Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the CDL Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VSDA and CDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VSDACDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.86

-0.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.63

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.66

0.65

+0.02

Drawdowns

VSDA vs. CDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VSDA drawdown since its inception was -32.12%, smaller than the maximum CDL drawdown of -41.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VSDA and CDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VSDACDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.12%

-41.03%

+8.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.44%

-5.66%

-3.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

-12.87%

-2.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.14%

-17.28%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.28%

-2.19%

-4.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-4.35%

+0.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.67%

1.59%

+2.08%

Volatility

VSDA vs. CDL - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF (VSDA) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF (CDL) at 2.66%. This indicates that VSDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VSDACDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

2.66%

+0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

6.86%

+1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.23%

9.75%

+1.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.03%

13.85%

+0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.59%

17.04%

-0.45%

VSDA vs. CDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both VSDA and CDL have an expense ratio of 0.35%.


Dividends

VSDA vs. CDL - Dividend Comparison

VSDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, less than CDL's 3.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CDL
VictoryShares US Large Cap High Dividend Volatility Wtd ETF
3.17%3.33%3.27%3.61%3.31%2.60%3.32%3.04%3.32%2.87%2.97%1.28%
VSDA
VictoryShares Dividend Accelerator ETF
2.61%2.65%2.36%1.92%1.83%1.40%1.49%1.36%1.69%1.23%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VSDA and CDL have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VSDA has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to CDL (2.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VSDA dropped -32.12% vs CDL's -41.03%.

On 5-year performance, CDL leads with 8.68% vs 6.69% for VSDA. Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. On volatility, CDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, CDL has performed better with a 8.68% return vs 6.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSDA and CDL have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.

CDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 2.61% for VSDA.

VSDA is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while CDL is Large Cap Value Equities. VSDA tracks Nasdaq Victory Dividend Accelerator Index, while CDL tracks Nasdaq Victory U.S. Large Cap High Dividend 100 Volatility Weighted Index.

CDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.86 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VSDA and CDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer